0
The Romans generally used the numeral IIII to represent the number 4. Later however, to bring this in line with the rule that states that no numeral should appear more than three times in succession, IV was adopted in preference to IIII. Some older watches, clocks and sundials still have the old version.
What else can I help you with?
What number is the Roman numeral xiil?
If we are talking about xiii, it would be 13. If the last is an L, it's wrong.
Why does your citron quartz watch have wrong roman numeral for 5?
The roman numeral for 5 is V. I do not have a citron quartz watch but a quick search through google images shows that citron uses the correct numeral. On *some* watches the numeral is upside down but this is merely because they chose to keep the top of the numeral to the outside of the watch. It looks a bit strange but it is correct.
Why is xxvvii wrong for 32?
It is not wrong because XXVVII as a Roman numeral is 10+10+5+5+1+1 = 32 which is equivalent to XXXII meaning 10+10+10+1+1 = 32
What is wrong with most correctly constructed Roman numeral clocks?
Some Roman numeral clocks use IIII to represent 4, which is how most Romans would have written it. However, in order to comply with the rule that no numeral should be writen more than three times in succession the number 4 is now more correctly written as IV.
What is roman numeral MDCCCLXXIx in number form?
Oh, isn't that a lovely Roman numeral? Let's see, MDCCCLXXIX translates to 1879 in regular numbers. Just imagine those numerals as little happy trees on your canvas, each one bringing a unique touch to the final masterpiece.
What number is the Roman numeral xiil?
If we are talking about xiii, it would be 13. If the last is an L, it's wrong.
Why does your citron quartz watch have wrong roman numeral for 5?
The roman numeral for 5 is V. I do not have a citron quartz watch but a quick search through google images shows that citron uses the correct numeral. On *some* watches the numeral is upside down but this is merely because they chose to keep the top of the numeral to the outside of the watch. It looks a bit strange but it is correct.
What is IV course?
The Roman numeral IV represents the number 4. If however you are referring to IV medical treatment you have placed the question in the wrong category.
Why is xxvvii wrong for 32?
It is not wrong because XXVVII as a Roman numeral is 10+10+5+5+1+1 = 32 which is equivalent to XXXII meaning 10+10+10+1+1 = 32
What is wrong with most correctly constructed Roman numeral clocks?
Some Roman numeral clocks use IIII to represent 4, which is how most Romans would have written it. However, in order to comply with the rule that no numeral should be writen more than three times in succession the number 4 is now more correctly written as IV.
What was wrong with the Greek and Roman numbering system?
There was nothing wrong with theGreekand Roman numbering systems. They were complicated. They have beenreplacedby the Arabic numeral system because it is much easier to use.
What is roman numeral MDCCCLXXIx in number form?
Oh, isn't that a lovely Roman numeral? Let's see, MDCCCLXXIX translates to 1879 in regular numbers. Just imagine those numerals as little happy trees on your canvas, each one bringing a unique touch to the final masterpiece.
What is 43 in Roman Numeral?
XXXXIIIOoops. Not quite XXXXIIIRoman numerals don't have more than three of the same symbols in a row. The number 43 is XLIII. L is 50, X takes away 10. III is 3.Best.Improved Answer:The first contibutors answer of XXXXIII for 43 is perfectly correct and the Romans themselves would have simplified this to XLIII (-10+53 = 43)The second contributors claim that Roman numerals don't have more than 3 of the same symbols in a row is wrong because some clocks and watches have the Roman numerals for 4 as IIII.Furthermore, the Roman numeral for 29 can be expressed as XXVIIII as can be seen today in the ruins of the Coliseum in Rome.
What is the roman numeral MCMLXV mean?
The answer is 1960.If you think I am wrong Google it.I am 10 years old.Thank You.Solution 1960.Improved Answer:-In todays modern notation of Roman numerals they represent 1965
Is a roman numeral for 9 is viiii Sometimes?
If you were to write is as VIIII That would be wrong. That means a diffrent number.The correct way it would be done is IX. Any other version is wrong and it would mean a diffrent numberImproved Answer:-Yes 9 is equivalent to IX or VIIII in Roman numerals
What is the Hindu Arabic numeral of XDV?
The no. is wrong
What was wrong with the roman numerals number system?
It lacked a zero symbol which was not needed
