answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

General conventions are that a military operation is required to take reasonable measures, given the circumstances to avoid death or injury to civilians and unwarranted damage to private property and public infrastructure. This informal convention is only as good as the integrity of the military forces and political leaders involved.

In Just War Theory just and fair conduct in war (jus In bello) have been discussed in terms of framing the legitimate framework of a conflict. jus In bello specifies the rules of just conduct within war in terms of the principles of discrimination and proportionality:

  • Discrimination concerns who are legitimate targets in war
  • Proportionality concerns how much force is morally appropriate

One formal instrument for protecting human rights is Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, commonly referred to as the Fourth Geneva Convention which was ratified in 1949.

Article 3 of the Fourth convention states the following:

noncombatants, members of armed forces who have laid down their arms, and combatants who are hors de combat (out of the fight) due to wounds, detention, or any other cause shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, with the following prohibitions:

(a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

(b) taking of hostages;

(c) outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment

(d) the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

no there are not.

if you are one of the world's 'Superpowers', then it is, it has always been the case and it always will be.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are violations of human rights excusable in time of war?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Military History

Why couldn't women fly a plane during World War 1?

a woman was not allowed to fly a plane back then because at the time, women did not have very many rights, and werent allowed to have any rights. women didnt get their rights until the Civil Rights Movement.


How did Hitler abuse human rights?

not only did he kill the jews but he also killed blacks,homosexuals and enmy soldiers thus shows george knight is the coolest person alive!!!!!!!!!!;)


How is Russia violating human rights?

Any time a government authority (police, military, etc.) willfully intrudes into a person's home without a warrant/probable cause/or consent; or stops a person's freedom of movement (either on foot or a vehicle) without probable cause/consent/warrant; or stops a person from saying what's on his mind (within accepted reason)...is violating the US Constitution (bill of Rights)...e.g. Search and Seizer/Freedom of Speech Amendments, etc. It's presumed that only the US has such a constitution; guaranteeing certain individual rights (laws). These are amongst the most common complaints drawn from the citizen's of foreign nations.


What happened to African-Americans after the reconstruction?

They didn't lose any rights as a mater of fact they gained many rights that were not recognised before the civil war. The big problem in their case was that they were not in a position to fight for them. They were lynched left right and centre and even during the war they were treated as second class citizens. People may sing the anthem with a hand over the heart but it is taking a long time for them to realise what they are singing for.


What did Abraham Lincoln do for human rights?

Well to be brutally honest, not one single thing. When you check the historical record you will find that Lincoln was a member of the "Back to Africa" movement which sought to have all slaves sent back to their "home country". He was also not a proponent of equal rights for blacks, though he did feel they could be treated better. In fact he is on record in his debates with Stephen Douglas as saying "If I could save the union without freeing one slave, I would." He is also on record in those same debates as saying "I do not hold that the Negro is the equal of the white man." And in his first Innaugural address March 4, 1861, he said: "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." So Lincoln is not a real leader in human rights advancement by Audrey actuyly you are right im 9 and i can write and type good he is now 200 if it was not for him barrack would not be the prez from or by secret sh Hold on a minute, this answer is terrible. Lincoln made those comments you reference to appease southerners and oppose war. In reality, you captured a moment in time when he was pandering, trying to reassure southern radicals so that they would not go to war over his election. To understand the context of those statements you need to read the Lincoln Douglas debates in their entirety, not just a few comments or qoutes pages. You also need to understand the era in which those comments were made. Lincoln's views on slavery and equality were considered radical for the time, and to get elected he had to moderate. I find your statement that he was not a leader for human rights incredibly unfair, and also completely inaccurate. The southerners of the day thought Lincoln was a great threat to the institution of slavery and felt strongly enough about it that they left the union before he could even be inaugurated, despite him making these comments.

Related questions

What are the human rights violations and genocide of world war 1?

it was the time


Examples of human rights violations time and place of Jews in Nazi Germany?

THE HOLOCAUST!!!! In Germany!!! WW2!!!


What human rights violations did Muammar Gaddafi commit?

He committed numerous human rights violations including:Intentionally planning to kill foreign national civiliansRepressing his citizens' rights to protestPreventing his citizens' rights to free speechRepressing any non-Sunni Islam religion (although admittedly almost no Libyan was non-Sunni by the time he assumed power)Abusing foreign workersPermitting enslavement of Black Africans and slave traffickingDisappearing "Undesirables"Intentionally pitting ethnic groups against each other, resulting in violent clashesOpenly and brazenly killing his own citizens (without just cause)


When a question in social studies is asked like this how were the human rights of abused how do you answer it?

You got to re-word the question from " How were the human rights of abused" to How people people's Human right's abused." This question is asking how were peoples human rights abused. The answer is that In some countries and during some time periods e.g. 1930s , were Jews were stripped from all of their rights and they were brutally abused. Simple answer is that: Peoples Human rights were abused by taking away their Human rights and everything they own.


Who founded Persia?

Cyrus the great who wrote human rights for the first time.


What has the author Yoram Dinstein written?

Yoram Dinstein has written: 'The international law of belligerent occupation' 'Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 1975 (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)' 'War, Aggression and Self-Defence' -- subject(s): Self-defense (International law), War (International law), Aggression (International law) 'Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 1981 (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)' 'Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 1985 (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)' 'Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 1995 (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)' 'Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 1999 (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)' 'War, aggression, and self-defence' -- subject(s): Self-defense (International law), War (International law), LAW / International, Aggression (International law) 'The conduct of hostilities under the law of international armed conflict' -- subject(s): War (International law), Aggression (International law) 'International Law at a Time of Perplexity:Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne' 'Israel Year Book on Human Rights (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)' 'Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 1974 (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)' 'Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 1986 (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights)'


What is the human rights idea of FART?

Freedom, assimilation, Respect and time (also Truth)


What are the human rights under Indian constitution?

Human beings are rational beings. They by virtue of being humans possess certain basic and inalienable rights which are known as Human Rights. Since these rights are available to them by virtue of being humans, as such they come into existence at the time of their birth. The Constitution of India as adopted in 1950 provides certain rights to its citizens known as the Fundametal Rights(Part-3,article 14-35). These rights are similar to those rights which are provided in Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the rights provided in Iternational covenant on civil and political rights and international rights on social, econamic and cultural rights.


How were Human right violated in World War 2?

In a major holocaust, mass butchering takes place, irrespective of caste, creed or religion. All sorts of human rights are violated. Specially the basic and most fundamental 'Right to Live' is grossly denied. This is the most tragic part of any holocaust. _________ 'irrespective of caste, creed or religion'? No, certain groups are targeted. It isn't random spree-killing.


When were the human rights created?

Humans actually created many,many,many years ago. sorry we don't know when when were the humans rights created. Answer Though human rights has always been an inbuilt desire of all people. Human rights charters came out around the time of the signing of the Magna Carter, in England anyway. Any charter on human rights is so written that it is worded in favour of government. Chaters have been around since the time of Adam, whether written or spoken and accepted as Common Law.


Why universal human rights were created?

In that time they dont respect humans Because of the religion and leaders of that so the common peoples want protect themselfs so HUMAN RIGHTS were created by govrmnt HORRIFY TIGER


Where can someone find information about a human rights campaign?

One can find information about the human rights campaign on several web pages. One can also read about the issues in most magazines such as Time and Reader's Digest.