The disagreement that resulted in the Missouri compromise was that Missouri, part of the Louisiana Purchase, should be a slave state according to the South. The North thought that it should be free of slaves, so eventually, Henry Clay made it so that Missouri was a slave state, and Maine was a free state. That made it so that slavery was banned in the remainder of the Louisiana Territory north of the 36*30 parallel.
Missouri compromise
Under the 1850 Compromise, New Mexico and Utah were allowed in as slave-states, in exchange for California as free soil. After that, Kansas and Nebraska were to be admitted on a local vote on slavery ('Popular Sovereignty'). This resulted in bloodshed that foreshadowed the Civil War.
That Scott had no right to argue in court
The invasion of Normandy ultimately resulted in the defeat of Germany.
The Compromise of 1850 made things worse between the north and the south by not providing a permanent solution to the issue of slavery. This compromise only drug out the dispute that was taking place for an additional 10 years which allowed for people to get more upset over the issue.
whether new states should be admitted as slave or free states
Missouri compromise
Missouri Compromise. (NOTW)
Answer this question… California became a free state.
The acquisition of huge territories from Mexico, including California, which was too big to fit the terms of the Missouri Compromise.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 resulted in the admission of Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. This was done to maintain the balance between slave and free states in the Union. The compromise also established a line (the 36°30′ parallel) above which slavery was prohibited in the Louisiana Territory, except for Missouri.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The Compromise ruled that any territory north of 36 30 latitude would be free and below it would be slave.
Check out this quote from Wikipedia on the Missouri Compromise (which, I'm assuming is what you need more information on): "Controversy over whether Missouri should be admitted as a slave state, resulted in the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which specified that Louisiana Purchase territory north of latitude 36° 30', which described Missouri's southern boundary, would be organized as free states and territory south of that line would be reserved for organization as slave states. As part of that compromise, the admission of Maine as a free state was secured to balance Missouri's admission as a slave state."
No. The effect of the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) was to supersede (nullify) the Missouri Compromise, rendering it inapplicable to future states. The geographical division was not applied, but rather "popular sovereignty" within a state would decide the issue of slavery there. This resulted in internecine warfare in the states of Kansas and Missouri, and murderous attacks by both sides (abolitionists and pro-slavery).The Missouri Compromise (1820) was never actually repealed per se.
The Great Compromise of the Constitution resulted in new branches of government. These branches are still in use today, they are the legislature, with the two houses.
3/5 Compromise
The compromise of the framers regarding representation in the legislative branch resulted in the Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise) of 1787. This agreement established a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population to satisfy larger states, and the Senate providing equal representation with two senators per state to appease smaller states. This balance sought to address the conflicting interests of populous and less populous states, ensuring broader support for the new Constitution.