0
Did the US stance on communism play a large role in its decision to get involved in Vietnam?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Absolutely. The war was entirely based upon the principle of containing communism.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agocuz it was part of cold war ennit?
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was president Nixons stance on Vietnam?
He wanted to end the stalemate and remove U.S. troops from Vietnam.
Describe goldwater stance on cuba and north vietnam?
Goldwater wanted to use nuclear weapons on Cuba and North Vietnam.
What was Eugene McCarthys stance in the Vietnam War?
McCarthy ran on a Democratic anti-war platform during the 1968 presidential race.
What is a moral stance?
A Moral stance is your attitude or view point that helps you make a decision. That decision can be based on three things: Religious Authority - following what you religion advices you to do. Egoism - Doing what is best for yourself. Utilitarianism - Doing what is best for the majority of people, but not all.
Reasons for why Australia groups supported the involvement in Vietnam war?
It was given as an attempt to stem the spread of Communism in southeast Asia.In favor of Australian involvementDomino Theory: If Vietnam fell to communism, South-East Asia would follow, and South Asia would be at high risk of communist invasion.Forward Defense. The fear was raised that an enemy not engaged in Vietnam would be fought eventually onshore in Australia.Perpetuating Alliance. Australia had grim memories of the Japanese advance and the inability of Britain to help. Australia had then needed and continued to need alliance with the United States of America for its security.Repelling communism. The Russian and Chinese leadership were perceived as openly threatening to the non-communist world. The mercurial Sukarno had been courted by the Soviet Union, and had the awkward habit of referring to Australia as "Irian Jaya Selatan" - the great hot South Land, as though it would in time be part of the Indonesian archipelago. Australia had been involved in the repulsion of communist guerillas in Malaya.Supporting the non-communist people of South Vietnam.Against Australian involvementVietnam had been a French colony, and was fighting for independence. The war was a perpetuation of the colonial system.The war in Vietnam had characteristics of a civil war. Honourable support would be to bring the conflict to a negotiating table.Guerilla war is a catalogue of atrocities, with no possibility of defining the enemy on the ground. Thus all civilians are at risk of death or injury.Prosecution of the war by use of napalm, bombing and defoliants caused revulsionAlthough there are some important factors presented in the answer above, it has not answered the question exactly; There were six main reasons for Australia's involvement in the Vietnam war. The defeat of the German and Japanese in WWII did not bring upon the expected times of peace, but instead a new conflict called the Cold War arose between those of Democratic and Communist countries. During the post-war period, Communism was viewed as a threat to Australian democracy because of the way rights and freedoms were taken away from citizens. There were six main reasons for Australia's involvement in the Vietnam war these were; the ANZUS treaty of 1951 and the SEATO treaty of 1954, closer ties with our 'Great and Powerful friends' (particularly the United States), Forward defence, the request from the Vietnamese Government and finally support for non-communists in Vietnam for Humanitarian reasons but the most vital reason upon which the Australians decided to fight in Vietnam was the Perceived threat of communism.An exceptionally important reason for Australia's commitment in Vietnam was the perceived threat of communism. Australians had a dominant fear of communism and this fear was enforced and fed by the Australian Government and media, things like the obsession of Reds Under The Bed, which was the allusion that the 'reds' (communists) were everywhere and plotting a revolution, as well as the use of propaganda as a political platform, Australia had experienced 20 years of the Liberal Govt. enforcing the fear of communism, and there was also a belief and fear of the Domino Theory, which meant that if one country fell to communism, one by one, so would those around it, Australia's fears were worsened in 1949 when China fell to communism. "Get Smart" the tv series was a form of propaganda against communism, the communists painted as the "villains" and the Democratic's as the "Heroes", other forms of propaganda include "The Red River" and "Nearer, Clearer and Deadlier". Even the reasons mentioned below all link back to the perceived threat of communism, the perceived threat of Communism is definitely the most vital reason upon which Australia decided to fight in the Vietnam War.Another reason that is not as vital, but still important is the desire for closer ties with our 'Great and Powerful friends' as Menzies reffered to them. Particularly the United States. During this time of war and indecision, Australia needed to ensure it's safety and engage in closer ties with our 'Great and Powerful Friends' particularly the United States as well as "Cultivating our relationship with the United States" as stated by Percy Spender. Lyndon Johnson, the president of the United States at the time introduced the 'More Flags Campaign' in order to involve more countries in the Vietnam war, Australia was one of the first countries to volunteer to fight, in order to build up credits with the U.S, to help ensure Australia's security from future threats. The United States was a country of great power and influence, also known as a world power, Australia also desired for closer ties with the U.S in concern of the 'Domino Theory' and fears that communism would reach Australia, The United States was leading the fight against The Soviet Union in the Cold war and Australia supported the same ideologies as the USA. The desire for closer ties with the U.S, although not as important as the perceived threat of communism is still a major reason why Australia fought in the Vietnam War.Of slightly less importance but still linked to the reasons above was the question of alliances such as; ANZUS and SEATO. The ANZUS treaty was signed in 1951and involved; Australia, New Zealand and the United States. The SEATO treaty of 1954 was created in order to combat the threat of communism, the countries that were involved included; The U.S, Australia, New Zealand, Britain, France, The Philipines, Pakistan and Thailand. Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam could not sign the treaty because they were included in the sections of the 1954 Geneva Convention. Although Vietnam was not a signatry of SEATO, Australia still went ahead and fought in Vietnam, communism had become a worldwide threat. Both Treaties ANZUS and SEATO had very little legal effect, the ANZUS treaty stated the requirement to "consult", this is a clear indication on the limitations on the treaties. Therefore it is clear, that while still important, the Alliances were an important but not vital feature that pushed Australia to fight in Vietnam.Of lesser importance but still significant was the policy of Forward Defence. Robert Menzies stated; "If there is a war of our own existence it should be carried out as far from our soil as possible". The general idea of Forward defence was the need for battles to be carried on away from Australia. Menzies had sent troops to Korea and Malaya in order to enforce this belief. Although Vietnam was a good distance from Australia, this was a surefire tactic of stopping the spread of communism in SE Asia. Forward defence wasn't the most important reason for Australia's commitment in the Vietnam war, but it was still a significant contributing factor.The request from the Vietnamese Government was of minor importance as it was a token invitation that was received on the 29th of April, 1965, Ambassador Anderson states; "Australian Government's offer to send Vietnam an infantry batalion of 800 men with some 100 logistical personel to serve with the United States forces in assisting the defense of the Republic of Vietnam". The war in Vietnam was a civil, nationalistic war, fighting in order to become united, In actuality, Australia had no real obligation to send troops to Vietnam and fight with the South, But it would please the U.S to show support therefore it is clear that the request from the Vietnamese government was not one of the most important reasons for Australia's commitment in the War of Vietnam.Another important reason but certainly not of the same importance of thos above would be the concern of the Australian Public for the non-communists of Vietnam. Australians would have sympathized with the Vietnamese under communist rule, as there were many freedoms that were taken away from them by the Government, this included; freedom of speech, movement, enterprise and press, the people of South Vietnam would be affected by communism particularly, economically and socially. Communist countries do not value personal freedoms and completely control the direction of one's life. The 60's and 70's was a time of great change for rights, and people were outraged by the lack of freedoms that the Vietnamese people possessed, although it was not one of the most important reasons for Australia's commitment in Vietnam it managed to fuel the fire on the fear and perceived threat of communism.Subsequently it is clear that the prominent reason for Australia's commitment in Vietnam was the percieved threat of communism. Although there were several reasons of different importance for Australia's involvement in the Vietnam War like; the desire for closer ties, the alliances, forward defence, the request from the Vietnamese Government and Australia's concern for non-communists in Vietnam. By far the most significant reason for Australia's commitment in the Vietnam war was The perceived threat of communism, as all reasons can be traced back to this particular notion.
What was Russia's official stance on the Vietnam war?
That it was a civil conflict and that the USSR was not involved.
Did the us stance on communision play a huge role in getting involved in the Vietnam war?
It was the only role. Otherwise the US would have stayed out of it.
What was president Nixons stance on Vietnam?
He wanted to end the stalemate and remove U.S. troops from Vietnam.
Describe goldwater stance on cuba and north vietnam?
Goldwater wanted to use nuclear weapons on Cuba and North Vietnam.
Meaning of fundamental stance?
Fundamental stance is a term used in moral theology. In short, it is the fundamental decision we make as to the type of person we want to be. Our fundamental stance guides a persons character and actions. A Christians fundamental stance is one in which the great commandement of love is central. Fundamental stance is part of the fundamental option theory of moral theology. Fundamental option is that decision of faith we enter into as to whether we will commit our lives to God or not.
What was Muhammad Ali's stance on the Vietnam Was?
He was against it, saying: "No Viet Cong ever called me 'nigger".
What does it mean to contain communism?
'Containing' Communism was a stupid thing the US thought it had to do. The US didn't like Communism, probably because they didn't undesrtand it at all or were afraid it was better than their economic stance, so they said that they had to contain communism by arresting people who supported communism. yeah, freedom of speech and thought...
Moderates in the Civil Rights movement were frustrated with Dr King's stance against the Vietnam War?
True
What ways did Johnson continue Kennedy's approach to the cold war?
The official stance of the government was containment of communism and with the escalating war in Vietnam LBJ continued with the policy that was set WW2. I have read books on JFK that had he lived he was going to get the United States out of Vietnam. He was against war having fought in WW2 and was badly wounded when his PT boat was sunk. We will never know what he planned or how he was going to do it.
Is it true that the Moderates in the Civil Rights movement were frustrated with Dr King's stance against the Vietnam war?
true
What was Nixon's stance toward the Vietnam war in 1969?
He felt he could improve the United States position through China.
What would have happened if the US was more aggressive in trying to force the Soviets to retreat from North Vietnam and for the US to do so under the idea of unification of Vietnam?
Since North Vietnam was heavily subsidized by BOTH China and the Soviet Union, a more aggressive stance on North Vietnamese soverenty could easily lead to a direct military conflict with China and the Soviet Union. That was a situation neither of the three countries involved were interested in starting.
