There was no difference between Confederate bullets and Union bullets. Both the Union and Confederate troops used any weapons and bullets that they could find. Weapons and bullets were frequently stolen from the other side.
The Allies decided to invade North Africa. This would give troops experience. Also, once they got to North Africa, they would be able to help British forces.
from England
They wanted to defeat the British and French before American troops could be used.
We were not able to use all our military power in this war. We could not invade the North, we could not move into Laos and Cambodia (the Ho Ch Min Trial). In order to win a land war you must occupy the the enemy's for a period of time. We bombed the North but could not conduct any operations on the ground in North Viet Nam. (Short Answer) So to say that our troops did not perform well in Viet Nam is not accurate.
There are many reasons the north won the war, including more troops (population) and more weapons (industry) but I personally think the main reason is because of transportation. The north had railroads that they could use to transport men, food, and weapons to wherever they're needed most faster than the south could.
I could go on and on with this, but to keep it simple: -the north had more industry than the south -therefore, the north could produce more weapons and clothing -the north also had a vast railroad network-that allowed them to transport troops and supplies quicker -the north also had a good telegraph system-Lincolon could issue direct orders Those are some of the factors the north had going for them, so even if the south was very determined, they could not beat the north on industry, and that is probably why they lost the war.
The North's economy consisted mainly of factories and industrial products. The South however was strongly agricultural because of the lack of its railroads and factories. Bottom line the North was already an industrial state so during the war it outproduced the South weapons wise and outnumbered the South at an alarming rate. Thanks to the North's railroad system weapons troops could be easily shipped through the nation where as in the South troops and weapons were transported less efficiently. The South really lost the war from the beginning and only survived thanks to General Robert E Lee's leadership.
It depends where they were looking. They could find many nuclear weapons in North Dakota, for example.
Weapons like machine guns could easily kill troops in the open.
So they could give loans and other monatary donations to the troops.
More men and more weapons (the north could build them, they were industrialized).
So they could give loans and other monatary donations to the troops.
President Richard M. Nixon called it "Vietnamization" by training South Vietnamese troops to use U.S. weapons so that the American military could leave.
The North (Union) had many transportational advantages that the South did not have. 1. The North's system of railroads were far superior to the South. 2. The North had a more advanced boat/river system and strenuously built canals years before the war broke out. 3. The road system in the North was far more advanced than the South, which had mostly dirt roads for troops to travel on. 4. Also, the terrain of the North was less boggy and more agrarian than the North, which made it easier for Union troops to transverse the land. 5. Since the North was larger and had more money; they could afford to buy more horses and wagons for troops carrying supplies, weapons, and other war material.
The U.S. has thousands of nuclear weapons. It could probably turn the entire world, to say nothing of North Korea, into a nuclear wasteland if it felt like it.
There was no difference between Confederate bullets and Union bullets. Both the Union and Confederate troops used any weapons and bullets that they could find. Weapons and bullets were frequently stolen from the other side.