No, however Congress decides whether or not to get involved in conflict.
Congress plays a crucial role in overseeing and funding the military in the United States. It has the power to declare war, regulate military forces, and provide the necessary appropriations for defense spending. Additionally, Congress conducts oversight through various committees to ensure accountability and adherence to laws governing military operations. This system of checks and balances helps maintain civilian control over the military.
When an individual or entity has complete control over a nation's armed forces, it is often referred to as "military dictatorship" or "military rule." In such a system, the military exerts significant influence over the government and may operate without civilian oversight. This concentration of power can undermine democratic institutions and civil liberties.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
The War Powers Resolution, enacted in 1973, is a federal law aimed at checking the president's power to commit the United States to armed conflict without congressional consent. It requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying military forces and limits military engagement to 60 days without a declaration of war or authorization from Congress. The resolution was enacted in response to concerns over the Vietnam War and the executive branch's unilateral military decisions. While it sought to restore legislative authority over military actions, its effectiveness and adherence have been subjects of ongoing debate.
The primary purpose of the War Powers Resolution, enacted in 1973, was to limit the President's ability to engage U.S. forces in hostilities without congressional approval. It aimed to ensure that both Congress and the President share in decisions related to military action, requiring the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops and restricting the use of armed forces for more than 60 days without congressional authorization. This legislation was a response to concerns over executive overreach in military engagements, particularly following the Vietnam War.
congress has the power to declare war, the president commands the armed forces
congress has the power to declare war, the president commands the armed forces
Congress has the power to declare war, while the president commands the armed forces.
Congress has the power to declare war, raise and fund the military, and regulate its organization and conduct. The president, as commander-in-chief, has the authority to command and control the military forces, make tactical decisions, and deploy troops. However, decisions to commit troops to war and engage in combat are shared powers between the president and Congress.
true
When an individual or entity has complete control over a nation's armed forces, it is often referred to as "military dictatorship" or "military rule." In such a system, the military exerts significant influence over the government and may operate without civilian oversight. This concentration of power can undermine democratic institutions and civil liberties.
The Congress has the ultimate control over the President's military power. However, the President is the supreme commander of all US military forces and can order military action such as air strikes or even armed intervention into a foreign country, and this is where disputes may arise with Congress. Congress controls the purse strings and so any unauthorized military action must be done with military supplies that are already on hand and so must be relatively limited and short-lived unless Congress agrees to authorize additional funds. Such authorization is likely to provoke resistance and debate in Congress. It is especially irksome if the President starts a war that is hard to get out of gracefully or safely for the troops involved and thus more of less forces Congress to support. .
The seizure and control of an area by military forces is called an "occupation." This term typically refers to the military presence and governance over a territory, often following a conflict or invasion. Occupations can involve the establishment of military administration and may last for varying durations, depending on the political and military circumstances.
congress does have complet control over the territories as it states in the constitution.READ THE CONSTITUTION!!
no, they would use their own security forces (MPs) for any trouble requiring a bunch of guys with assault rifles. how ever if the military turns over control to you maybe but unlikely
Congress was given control over trade between the states.
The combatant commander in the region where US forces are deployed maintains operational control and authority over those forces. This ensures that the forces are effectively coordinated and their actions align with the overall objectives of the mission. The combatant commander is responsible for the planning, employment, and direction of military operations in their area of responsibility.