World War I significantly strained the relationship between Turks and Americans, primarily due to the Armenian Genocide, where the Ottoman Empire systematically exterminated Armenians, leading to widespread condemnation from American observers and humanitarian organizations. The U.S. government's response and the subsequent recognition of these events as genocide have remained contentious issues, affecting diplomatic relations. Additionally, the post-war reshaping of the Middle East and the emergence of modern Turkey further complicated interactions, as American interests began to focus on the region's geopolitical significance. Overall, the war set the stage for a complex and often fraught relationship that has evolved over the decades.
dont you means vegetarians and turkeys wait wait wait...... vegetarians dont eat turkeys do they?
he saved his troop when they were captured by the Turks he had to kill 5 Turks
Seljuk Turks conquered Anatolia after their success at the Battle of Manzikert in 1078 CE.
I don't know how they felt emotionally, if that is what you're trying to find out. Fact is, however, that the Australians fought against the Turks during the battle of Gallipolli. So I don't think the Australians considered the Turks to be their 'mates'. The reason the Australians fought against the Turks, was probably the pressure put on them by Great Britain. I don't know how willing they were to actually fight the Turks though.
Porbably turks are very hard working when it comes to physical labour and costs a lot less
good but the war messed it up
The Americans were fighting the Germans.Some did fight the Turks and Italians.They also called the enemies Hungarians.
There were the rulers and the workers
the Americans
Koreans, Chinese, Russians, British, Turks, Americans, UN
Freindly
How many air miles from BWI and turks and caicos
There is no direct relationship; the Turks were never much interested in exploration and discovery. But in their attempts to control and profit from Europe's desire for spices from the Orient - India and southeast Asia - they indirectly encouraged the European explorers and discoverers to attempt to sail AROUND the Turks. Columbus sailed west from Spain in the belief that not only was the world round (he was right, of course, but everyone was already certain of this) but that he could sail west and reach India. He even named the islands that he discovered the "West Indies".
On their Western borders, the Safavids had very problematic relations with the Ottoman Turks, who they considered their political and religious rivals. They also had rocky relations with the Bukharans of Uzbekistan and the Mughals of India.
The Turks undertook a series of actions to conquer the Byzantine Empire. This lead to the crusades, which included a series of wars between Europeans and Turks. After the crusades, the Turks continued working to conquer the Byzantine Empire until they finally succeeded in 1453. This ended the Middle Ages, but not the Turkish conquests in Europe.
They hoped to achieve the war between them and the Turks. Unfortunately they did fail to do so. The Turks stopped them by shooting them at a better advantage as they were on higher ground.
No.