Formerly the "civilized countries", now called the "modern societies", or possibly the "industialized countries." Which ever term the historian/student wishes to use, when those nations are at war "some" historians like to refer to them as world wars. For WW1; that war was a world war because it was fought in the Indian, Pacific, Atlantic Oceans. However, WW2 was more accurately termed a world war, as it was more accurately fought all over the world. The Korean War could have been called a world war, as it had as many countries fighting in it as did WW1; but the Korean War was restricted to the Korean Peninsula. For example, there were no Korean War battles fought in the Atlantic Ocean.
There are too many countries and too many wars to give you an answer. You need to pick a country and a war or a time.
For most countries, it was 16 years old.
The question is incomplete. You need to supply a clearer idea of what you are trying to ask
They didn't take over any countries. Germany, Italy and Austria-Hungary did but in the end Britain, France and Russia won the war so Britain didn't need to take over any countries.
At the beginning and towards the middle, yes enormously so. Countries had so much money, other countries had so much merchandise. Then, the countries began to run out of the money, and still need merchandise. Hence afterwards, the Great Depression
Many countries to, those are called 'third world countries'. There are a lot of them.
Look up World trade organization on wikipedia it will tell you all you need to know
This question has been in the question pool for a while and it was not answerable because it lacks information. The countries were not listed in the question so we were not able to give you a reason for their involvement in World War 2. If you still need the answer please restate your question and include the countries you need to know why they were involved in World War 2. Thanks for using answers com and wikianswers.
You will need the relevant licences for the countries involved
You need to be more specific. There were many leaders of many forces and countries.
You probably mean '....die out in certain countries' (and you need to specify the countries). Spanish is still spoken in Spain, and in many countries around the world.
The link provides all the information you need to know
you don't need to know if you can't spell countries
The world doesn't 'need' war. War is the result of a breakdown in relations between countries.
Lithuania is not a pointless country. All countries exist by right and none are pointless, no matter what their size or power. There are many small countries that have little impact on the world, but none of them are pointless.
50 COUNTRIES
No, America, should not get involved in other countries affairs, for many reasons. Firstly, there are so many problems in this country that need the money that the country is sending to other countries. People are homeless, out of jobs, about to get "thrown out of their homes," and still the country manages to get and send money and troops to other countries. Secondly, None of the countries, that America, is putting, its' "NOSE" into, ask for it's "help." Okay, I must say the Libyans asked for Americans help, so it might as well help. Those are some of my opinions....