answersLogoWhite

0

1. Getting enough radioactive material (uranium) to create the bomb
2. Producing enough enriched uranium (Separating the useful Uranium 235 isotope from the more common but useless for bombs Uranium 238 isotope)


3. Actually testing the bomb. Some of the scientists thought that the fission would continue indefinitely and consume the whole world. But they did it anyway because why not?

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What were the opinions of scientists and politicians involved in making the atomic bomb?

Politians where delighted for the most part and most scientists were too until the scientists developped the bomb and then they begged the politicians not to use it.


Why do scientists need a model of a atom?

Scientists use models of atoms to help them visualize and understand the structure and behavior of atoms. Models provide a simplified representation of complex processes, making it easier to study and predict atomic interactions and properties. This helps scientists develop theories and make predictions about the behavior of matter at the atomic level.


Why do scientists make big bombs?

Some scientists belived that making huge atomic bombs would actually put an end to war, making the ultimate weapon that people were to afraid to use. Other scientists have worked for their country to produce large bombs, so that their country will remain a dominant world power.


Who is responsible of making a nuclear or atomic bomb?

the US army headed a secret team of scientists called the Manhattan project - they did the science, developed the ideas and worked with engineers to make the first atomic bomb on 1944-1945.


How do scientists use dichotomous keys?

Scientists use dichotomous keys as a tool to help identify unknown organisms based on their characteristics. The key presents a series of paired statements about the organism's features, with the scientist choosing the statement that best matches the organism they are trying to identify. By following the key and making choices based on the characteristics observed, scientists can narrow down the potential identity of the organism.


Who is the US scientist that is credited for making the atomic bomb?

There were literally thousands of scientists who participated; if you had to single one out, it would probably be scientific director Robert Oppenheimer.


Why would the scientists in the Aristotle have problems when making a map?

They might have thought the earth is a square shape when it is a round shape!I hope that answers your question!


How many pages does The Making of the Atomic Bomb have?

The Making of the Atomic Bomb has 886 pages.


What is the ISBN of The Making of the Atomic Bomb?

The ISBN of The Making of the Atomic Bomb is 0-671-44133-7.


Why is dimensional analysis useful in scientific calculations and problem-solving?

Dimensional analysis is useful in scientific calculations and problem-solving because it helps ensure that the units of measurement are consistent throughout the calculations. This method allows scientists to check the accuracy of their calculations and identify any errors that may have occurred. By using dimensional analysis, scientists can easily convert units and solve complex problems without making mistakes in the process.


Why is it difficult to identify potassium ions when sodium ions are present?

It is difficult to identify potassium ions when sodium ions are present because they have similar chemical properties and ionization energies, making them behave similarly in chemical reactions and spectroscopic techniques. Additionally, their atomic masses are close, which can lead to overlapping peaks in analytical techniques such as mass spectrometry or atomic absorption spectroscopy.


What type of reasoning do scientists use when looking at problems?

Scientists use deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning when looking at problems. Deductive reasoning involves making specific conclusions based on general principles or theories. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or theories based on specific observations or evidence. Both types of reasoning are important in forming hypotheses, making predictions, and drawing conclusions in scientific research.