answersLogoWhite

0

the nation was founded on the principle of consent of the governed.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History
Related Questions

Can an aunt claim a child on taxes that she doesn't support?

No. A niece or nephew cannot be claimed as a dependent unless the aunt is their legal guardian.No. A niece or nephew cannot be claimed as a dependent unless the aunt is their legal guardian.No. A niece or nephew cannot be claimed as a dependent unless the aunt is their legal guardian.No. A niece or nephew cannot be claimed as a dependent unless the aunt is their legal guardian.


What legal argument did South Carolina officials use to justify secession?

South Carolina officials justified their secession by invoking the principle of states' rights, arguing that the federal government had overstepped its constitutional authority, particularly regarding issues like slavery. They claimed that states had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional and that secession was a legitimate response to protect their sovereignty and way of life. Additionally, they cited the Declaration of Independence, asserting that a state could withdraw from the Union if it believed its rights were being violated.


How many signatures are needed to start the secession process?

The number of signatures required to start a secession process can vary significantly depending on the country or jurisdiction involved. In the United States, for example, there is no formal legal process for secession, so there are no specific signature requirements. Instead, any attempt at secession would likely involve political negotiations and state or federal legislative processes. In other countries, the requirements may be outlined in their constitutions or legal frameworks.


What does section three of the 20th amendment say about secession?

Section three of the 20th Amendment to the United States Constitution addresses the qualifications for members of Congress and the presidency but does not specifically mention secession. The amendment primarily deals with the terms of office and the procedures for handling vacancies and the transition of power. While it establishes important protocols, it does not provide a legal framework or commentary on the issue of secession itself. Issues of secession are more directly addressed in the context of the Civil War and subsequent legal interpretations rather than in the 20th Amendment.


How did President Lincoln handle the issue of secession in his 1861 inaugural address?

President Abraham Lincoln spent a good portion of his 1861 inaugural address on the issue of secession. That part of his speech took the form of a detailed legal brief denying the constitutionality of secession. His words dovetailed the illegality of secession with his oath as president to hold, occupy and posses the property and places belonging to the US government. He equated secession with anarchy.


Was secession an act of treason or a political decision?

Secession can be viewed as both an act of treason and a political decision, depending on one's perspective. From the standpoint of the federal government, secession was considered treasonous since it involved the rejection of national authority and unity. Conversely, many Southern states viewed secession as a legitimate political decision rooted in their rights and autonomy, particularly in response to perceived threats to their way of life and interests. Ultimately, the interpretation of secession hinges on legal, historical, and ideological contexts.


What is secession clause?

A secession clause is a legal provision within a constitution or agreement that outlines the process by which a specific region or group can legally separate or withdraw from the larger entity. It typically establishes the conditions under which secession is allowed and the steps that must be followed for it to be considered legitimate. These clauses help to regulate and manage potential conflicts related to regional sovereignty.


What was the arguments for and against the secession from the Union?

Arguments for secession from the Union primarily centered around states' rights and the belief that individual states had the authority to govern themselves, particularly regarding the institution of slavery. Southern states felt their economic and social systems were threatened by Northern opposition to slavery and federal policies. Conversely, arguments against secession emphasized the preservation of the Union, the belief in a collective national identity, and the idea that secession violated the Constitution, undermining the legal framework of the United States. Ultimately, this conflict over secession was a key factor leading to the Civil War.


Is racial profiling legal?

In many states in the U.S. racial profiling is legal and used by law enforcement officials. Racial profiling is a highly debated topic with supporters who agree with it and many who do not.


What is it called when a state leaves a country?

When a state leaves a country, it is referred to as "secession." This process involves a region or group declaring independence from the larger political entity, often resulting in conflict or legal disputes. Secession can occur for various reasons, including political, economic, or cultural differences. Notable historical examples include the secession of the Southern states during the American Civil War.


When part of a country leaves or breaks off from the rest?

This is known as secession, where a part of a country seeks to become independent from the rest of the country. It can be a contentious and complex process with political, legal, and sometimes violent implications. Examples include the breakup of Yugoslavia and the secession of South Sudan from Sudan.


Did US President James Buchanan believe secession was legal?

No. He did not believe it was legal, but also did not think the federal government had to power to enforce it. He did take steps to protect federal property in the seceding states, but did not want to start a civil war.