he was denided the spurim cort diecided he was not free and if you trying to do social studies this is not going to be right
The parallel that lined-up with Missouri's Southern border (36,30). This was the clear 'line in the sand' that kept the peace for thirty years. But it only applied to the territories acquired under the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When Ameriica acquired vast new territories from Mexico, a new compromise had to be worked out. This one did not last.
(the Louisiana Purchase)
The assurance that there would be no new slave-states North of the Missouri line.
The Missouri Compromise affected the area in the former Louisiana Territory, except within the boundaries of the state of Missouri. It was a compromise that prohibited slavery within the territory.
The Missouri Compromise
The Missouri Compromise only affected those territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. After the Mexican War, the vast new territories like California did not fall under the provisions of the Compromise.
It prohibited slavery North of a certain parallel, but only in the territories brought in under the Louisiana Purchase. When the new Mexican territories came in, they needed a new compromise. That one did not hold.
Yes, but only those territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
There were two. The Missouri Compromise of 1820, dealing with the territories acquired in the Louisiana Purchase. And the Compromise of 1850, dealing with the territories acquired from Mexico. A third one (the Crittenden Compromise), cobbled together at the last moment when Lincoln was inaugurated in March 1861, was rejected by the new President because it would have allowed some extension of slavery.
No new slave-states North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border. But this only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase. After the Mexican War, a new compromise had to be worked out.
The territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, which were awaiting admission to the USA. The Compromise put down down a line in the sand (parallel 36,30), North of which slavery would be illegal.
The concept of Compromise worked OK before the Mexican War, when the 'West' just meant the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. After the Mexican war, the concept of Compromise did not work. The vast new territories acquired from Mexico could not be accommodated according to this kind of ruling.
The concept of Compromise worked OK before the Mexican War, when the 'West' just meant the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. After the Mexican war, the concept of Compromise did not work. The vast new territories acquired from Mexico could not be accommodated according to this kind of ruling.
The Missouri Compromise addressed slavery in the Arkansas and unorganized territory of the Great Plains. Slavery was prohibited in all of these areas, except within the boundaries of Missouri.
It drew a line in the sand - anywhere North of that line, slavery would be illegal. This worked well enough, but it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase. The vast new territories acquired from Mexico in 1847 needed a new compromise. This one did not work.
Missouri itself - and after that, any of the other territories acquired by the Louisiana Purchase that were South of Missouri's Southern border, that was 36, 30.
South ofthat line, slavery was allowed. But it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the USA acquired vast new lands from Mexico in 1847, a new compromise had to be worked out, in view of the Wilmot Proviso, which declared that no slavery should be allowed in any of these new territories.