The concept of Compromise worked OK before the Mexican War, when the 'West' just meant the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
After the Mexican war, the concept of Compromise did not work. The vast new territories acquired from Mexico could not be accommodated according to this kind of ruling.
The cause is the Compromise of 1850, and the effect is the Southern filibuster ventures.
Slaves counted as three-fifths (3/5) of a person when censuses were taken to determine representation in Congress. This meant that the southern states had a smaller population count, and therefore, fewer members in the House of Representatives.
It allowed the slave-empire to extend Westward, so you could claim that it gave substance to the future Confederacy. But if there had been no compromise, the war would have started much sooner.
The Missouri Compromise of 1850 was made a moot compromise with the introduction of the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854. Neither pieces of legislation can be demonstrated as a cause of the US Civil War. And, both laws were deemed unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in the Dredd Scott case of 1857.
Yes, the Mexican-American War (1846-1848) significantly contributed to the tensions leading to the American Civil War. The conflict resulted in territorial gains for the United States, which intensified debates over the expansion of slavery into new territories. The subsequent compromise measures, such as the Compromise of 1850, failed to resolve the underlying issues, further polarizing the nation along sectional lines and setting the stage for the Civil War.
The concept of Compromise worked OK before the Mexican War, when the 'West' just meant the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. After the Mexican war, the concept of Compromise did not work. The vast new territories acquired from Mexico could not be accommodated according to this kind of ruling.
The cause is the Compromise of 1850, and the effect is the Southern filibuster ventures.
== ==
Yes
Infinite causal regression is the idea that every cause has a prior cause, leading to an endless chain of causes. This concept challenges our understanding of causality in complex systems by suggesting that there may not be a definitive starting point or ultimate cause for events, making it difficult to pinpoint the root cause of a phenomenon.
Yeast rafts can contribute to the development of a yeast infection by providing a platform for yeast cells to grow and multiply in the body, leading to an overgrowth of yeast that can cause infection.
Yes, alcohol consumption can contribute to sinus congestion. Alcohol can cause blood vessels to dilate, leading to increased blood flow to the sinuses and potentially causing congestion.
The concept you are referring to is the doctrine of proximate cause in criminal law. It holds that only the direct and immediate acts leading to a crime can be held liable, while more remote actions are not considered causal factors.
The leading cause of car accidents is usually attributed to human error, such as distracted driving, speeding, impaired driving, or reckless behavior. Various factors like weather conditions, road conditions, or mechanical failures can also contribute to accidents.
CMV is a leading cause of congenital deafness.
A viral infection can contribute to joint pain by triggering an inflammatory response in the body, leading to swelling and discomfort in the joints. The immune system's response to the virus can cause inflammation in the joints, resulting in pain and stiffness.
I'll be glad to contribute to your cause.