Scorched earth policy
Destroying everything that the enemy could use - food supplies, crops, buildings, factories, bridges, etc
Yes. He was meant to be destroying only buildings of military importance, but it went a lot further than that, and thousands were made homeless. That is why so few fine old buildings are still standing in Atlanta.
Told the residents to leave - briefly helping them carry away their belongings - before burning any buildings of military potential, but in the end destroying the city.
Tactic implemented by Russians, borrowed by the Germans. Retreating armies would burn buildings, ravage crops, cut down trees, and force inhabitants to flee. Goal was to leave nothing behind that opposing forces could use.
Many thousands. The majority of major buildings in German cities were destroyed.
Demolition coompanies.
The buildings are destroying the sacred religious areas of Jerusalem.
Round the outsides of important public buildings. Spreadsheets. Advancing armies.
It caused a lot of damage like destroying buildings
Because it can often be very destructive, destroying buildings, starting fires, etc.
Money is attained by destroying Government Property such as buildings and creating CHAOS
They don't change the earth. They change the area by destroying buildings, vegetation, ect.
A catapult's trajectory is the path that your projectile takes as it flies through the air.
Ummm destroying trees. hunting. building houses, resorts, buildings, stores, etc.
it effects peoples lives by killing humans and destroying buildings,homes and memories. leaving them in gory poverty.
Destroying everything that the enemy could use - food supplies, crops, buildings, factories, bridges, etc
Anti armor purposes, destroying fortifications, or used to eliminate hostiles inside of buildings