Yes, rearmament during the 1930's was avoidable.
During the disarmament conference at Geneva, the League of Nations, along with the US and the Sovier Union could have agreed to the limits of weapon to disarm and ignore their country's external sercurity.
In October 1933, Hitler had pulled Germany out of the Disarmament Conference because he wanted military equality. Hitler then annouced he was going to rearm. By 1935 he had increased the size of his army from 100 000 men to 550 000 men and had introduced conscription for all male citizens. Even though Hitler had broken the Treaty of Versailles no one was prepared to go against him and enforce the terms in the treaty. Hence, Hitler was abe to keep his army. His armament and military performance in the Spanish civil war had brought Europe's attention. They had seen how powerful and strong Germany were, and thus, countries near Germany starting rearming. Therefore
When Germany pursued rearmament in the 1930s, America had a weak response. America and the other Allies could have strongly objected since it was in direct violation of the Treaty of Versailles.
yes it was avoidable
Britain announced open rearmament on March 17, 1935. This decision marked a significant shift in its military policy during the interwar period, as it sought to rebuild its armed forces in response to rising tensions in Europe and the actions of Nazi Germany. The announcement was part of a broader context of rearmament across Europe leading up to World War II.
Rearmament during World War II significantly reduced unemployment as governments invested heavily in military production, creating millions of jobs in factories and related industries. This shift from civilian to military production mobilized the workforce, pulling many individuals out of unemployment. Additionally, rearmament stimulated economic activity, leading to increased demand for goods and services, further contributing to job creation. As a result, many countries experienced a dramatic decline in unemployment rates during this period.
the dictatorship
When Germany pursued rearmament in the 1930s, America had a weak response. America and the other Allies could have strongly objected since it was in direct violation of the Treaty of Versailles.
i don't know y they is making me di thsi cuz i don't no da answer im tryna figure itout but they ain't giving me nothing WOWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
avoidable and treatable is
Yes, avoidable is a word. The accident was avoidable. Interest on your credit card bill is avoidable if you pay up on time.
if violence was avoidable
yes it was avoidable
I wish this exercise was avoidable.
Rearmament in Germany during the 1930s played a crucial role in addressing unemployment by significantly expanding the military-industrial complex, which created millions of jobs. The government's investment in weapon production, infrastructure, and military training programs led to a reduction in joblessness from the devastating effects of the Great Depression. This policy not only stimulated economic growth but also fostered a sense of national pride and unity, as the populace rallied around the idea of rebuilding Germany's military strength. However, this rearmament ultimately contributed to the aggressive expansionist policies that led to World War II.
how much does fruit cost in the 1930s?
Yes.
Britain announced open rearmament on March 17, 1935. This decision marked a significant shift in its military policy during the interwar period, as it sought to rebuild its armed forces in response to rising tensions in Europe and the actions of Nazi Germany. The announcement was part of a broader context of rearmament across Europe leading up to World War II.
During WWII they just kind of ignored it. They wanted to remain isolated from the conflicts in Europe after WWI.