False
Rebels, Johnny, Johnny reb, reb and greyback were some names given the Confederate soldiers by the Union troops.
Article 92 of the UCMJ is anyone who fails to obey or violates a direct order or regulation given by chain of command. It is a soldier or armed forced personal having knowledge of an order given by chain of command and fails to complete his or her duties. It is neglectfully disregarding given instructions and abandoning duties or lacking in performance of duties.
A Kapo (sometimes spelled Capo) was a trusted prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp. Kapos were given various privileges and had to supervise other prisoners, maintain discipline, distribute food and so on. Many abused their power, of course, and ill-treated the other prisoners ... A Kapo was not a soldier and had no standing outside the camp.
In the WW1, also known as The Great War there were no vaccines or proper medical care given to the soldiers.
False
False
true
The Soldier will be notified if his/her medical record is given to his/her next of kin involved in the Soldier's care.
The Soldier will be notified if his/her medical record is given to his/her next of kin involved in the Soldier's care.
Unless being formally questioned in a place of Law and Justice, it is NOT illegal to record an official as long as they are notified and have given the consent to be recorded/documented. However, in most cases you must provide credible evidence as to why you are recording.
If they were notified of the death and given enough time to place their claims, they are out of luck. However, the court can order the estate reopened if it was not done properly.
The purpose of a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) is to determine if a soldier should be retained in his or her present MOS or even if he or she should be retained in the Army. It is a formal process to evaluate a soldier's ability to perform their military specialty to standard.Here are the general procedure for the MEB/PEB:The soldier's immediate commander (or supervisor, if the soldier is senior to the commander) writes an evaluation concerning the soldier's abilities to perfom a full range of duties.The soldier receives appropriate conseling related to the evaluation.The board (five voting members and a personnel advisor) gathers all required documents and reviews the documents to determine if they will review the case.The soldier is notified of the hearing and given the opportunity to appear (generally required, unless waived).The board reviews documents and discusses the situation with the soldier. The board may request additional people appear before the board to discuss the case.The board either deferrs or makes a decision about the case and informs the soldier of the results and submits their recommendations to the Convening Authority (usually a senior commander).The soldier is allowed an appropriate time for rebuttal (usually two working days).The board Convening Authority will review the board recommendations and soldier rebuttal (if any), then make a decision about the case.After the Convening Authority has reached a decision, the soldier is notified through the chain of command. The chain of command carries out the directions of the Convening Authority.If the soldier does not agree with the decision of the Convening Authority, there are several appeal options (depending on a variety of circumstances). Seek appropriate legal council for the appropriate action if you choose to appeal.See related links for a more detailed briefing on the process.
No, it would be unethical and, in the US, illegal to give your best friend information about test results in her husband's medical record unless he had given you express written permission to do so.
Soldier's keep journals to record events going on in their lives during the war they are fighting. Soldiers know that they may not go home and a journal is something that can be given to their loved ones.
To carry out the orders given by his or her superiors.
Whatever part is relevant to the case. This can vary widely as different Lawyers will argue for or against using something from a person's medical record in different ways and for different reasons. In the end it comes down to the Judge's decision on if it can be used or not based on the arguments given by both sides.