Machine guns in World War I had several disadvantages, including their heavy weight and the need for a crew to operate them, which limited mobility on the battlefield. They were also prone to overheating and mechanical malfunctions, which could render them ineffective during critical moments. Additionally, the static nature of trench warfare often led to stalemates, where the machine guns could dominate but also contributed to the high casualty rates and the grim psychological toll on soldiers. Lastly, their effectiveness diminished in open warfare scenarios, where mobility and rapid maneuvering became essential.
Yes. There were machine guns in WW1. There were Gatlin Guns, a type of machine gun, in the Civil War.Yes
Machine guns were in use BEFORE WW 1. They were around for the entire war.
No
They all did.
machine guns
the machine guns
Yes, they did have machine guns in WW2
Yes. There were machine guns in WW1. There were Gatlin Guns, a type of machine gun, in the Civil War.Yes
Machine guns were in use BEFORE WW 1. They were around for the entire war.
No
Most of the parties involved already had machine guns in their inventory prior to the outbreak of the First World War.
yes
All of the major players in WWI possessed machine guns before the outbreak of the war.
In World War 2 there were three types of machine guns used: squad support weapon, medium machine gun, and Heavy Machine gun such as the Browning M2, and the M1919
Machine guns have a higer rate of fire and so they shoot bulets faster
They all did.
machine guns