On the whole, the Cold War, like war in general, was hugely destructive, however, if I want to I can find some good results. The Cold War was the major reason for the competition between the US and the USSR known as the space race, which resulted in the moon landing in 1969. Perhaps without the Cold War as a motivation, we would never have gone to the moon. Of course, you might also argue that going to the moon was a stunt which did not change the human condition on Earth, however, that is not really the case. The space program was a fundamentally important source of scientific progress in many fields, such as computer science, which has proved to be of tremendous importance. All sorts of important technical problems had to be solved, to make possible the successful moon landing. So, something good was accomplished.
TECHNICALLY Communism ended
It was involve by contributing to the cold war
The Cold War was not "cold" per say, but was simply the name of a war that took place.
World War Two was an origin of the Cold War.
Yes, part of the cold war.
The War was over.
Today's hi-tech aircraft are the result of cold war experience and research, which in turn were combat tested in the Korean & Vietnam Wars. Nuclear engines. Landing a man on the moon; the space race.
TECHNICALLY Communism ended
William T. Golden has written: 'Impacts of the early Cold War on the formulation of U.S. science policy' -- subject(s): Science and state, Cold War 'Science Advice to the President' 'Worldwide Science and Technology Advice'
what are good impacts humans have on the savanna biome
One hot battle of a cold war.
There was no "front" in the Cold War.
polands are not in the cold war
Because it was a cold war (no war).
Peace of the Cold War was from a settlement. The Cold War was a long and hard war.
The Korean war was the first hot war in the cold war.
It was involve by contributing to the cold war