A secondary source document about the Cold War could be a book like "The Cold War: A New History" by John Lewis Gaddis. This work analyzes the events, ideologies, and impacts of the Cold War period, synthesizing information from various primary sources and historical accounts. It provides an interpretation of the Cold War's significance and context, rather than presenting firsthand experiences or original documents from that time.
If you are reading the actual letter, or an exact quote from that letter, it is a primary source.
No peace treaty officially ended World War II to document what went wrong in the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union.
It was involve by contributing to the cold war
The Cold War was not "cold" per say, but was simply the name of a war that took place.
World War Two was an origin of the Cold War.
A primary source comes from the time the person/subject was from (e.g newspapers from World War II, materials used by ancient tribes etc.) while a secondary source comes from after the person/subject was from
A secondary source is any document or record that analyzes, interprets, or summarizes primary sources. For example, a history textbook discussing events from World War II is a secondary source, as it relies on primary materials such as letters, photographs, and official documents from that time. Other examples include articles, biographies, and documentaries that provide commentary or analysis of primary data.
A declaration of war
A declaration of war
If you know what a secondary source is, then you should know that everything is both a primary and a secondary source, but on what is always the question. So, if you are wondering if it is a primary source on the war crimes trials, then clearly it is not as Marrus was not there. But there may be primary source material used in the book.
Tom used a magazine article as a secondary source in his report about the US Civil War. A secondary source should describe, discuss, interpret, comment upon, analyze, evaluate, summarize, and process primary sources.
The Eisenhower and Truman Doctrines
A documentary on medical treatments used during the war
If you are reading the actual letter, or an exact quote from that letter, it is a primary source.
Yes, a history textbook on the events of World War II is considered a secondary source. It analyzes, interprets, and summarizes information from primary sources, such as letters, diaries, and official documents from the time. Secondary sources provide context and commentary, allowing readers to understand the significance and impact of historical events.
When researching recent theories about the Cold War.
General Grant's Journal is a primary source. A primary source is an eye witness. It is what the person who was there actually saw. Such accounts are extremely important because they give a feel for the era. A secondary source would be what you would hear if one of your parents told you what they heard about World War 2. They would be passing on a story. Also, Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy, also wrote his memoirs. If someone took Grant's Journal and Davis' Memoirs and made a book, that would be a secondary source. Still, it might give a better overall picture of the war. So a primary source is one written by someone who saw what was going on.