Unit 731
Japanese and Nazi war criminals for "Crimes Against Humanity" .
The Allies held trials against Japanese citizens who brutally mistreated prisoners at war.
War crimes of the Wehrmacht happened in 1940.
Soldiers are charged with war crimes during the war and after the war. They can be charged with charges of murder, ill treatment of or the deportation of civilian residents of an occupied area and put into slave labor camps or torture camps, killing hostages, and any act of wanton destruction of cities, towns, villages or any devastation not justified by the military or for civilian necessity. They cannot just do what they want in other words. That is why the Japanese and Germans faced so many war crime charges. They violated the Geneva Convention and War Crimes Act.
baths
Define "nobody." Most Americans are of European descent, so it's natural that they would be more interested in war crimes occurring in Europe and not Asia.
gyakusatsu if your talking about Japanese war crimes they wont listen
a book on Japanese war crimes would be one whats the question?
Crimes against humanity were lived out in World War 2. Genocide, murder, torture, starvation, exposure to disease on purpose, intentional bombing or shooting that has no military purpose or authorization (also considered a war crime) and mass arson of people and their homes or in buildings (like what the Germans did to people in a church building). I have probably missed some types of crimes but it is pretty gruesome what some people have done to others. What the Nazis and Japanese did during the war was inexcusable and atrocious.
Tokyo
Japanese and Nazi war criminals for "Crimes Against Humanity" .
Japanese War CrimesRape, theft, murder, massacre, destruction of property, torture.As you know the Japanese were very inhumane to their captives. Any city or town they captured would be massacred and looted. After the war, many Japanese generals and admirals were tried and convicted of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and violoations of treatys
"Saving Private Ryan" is a very gruesome war movie that I have seen. "Brave Heart", however, is considered to be very gruesome as well. An Honorable Mention would have to go to the Russian version of "War and Peace". It was 7 hours long and there where scenes of massive troops in battle and it was quite realistic. "300" is an animation movie that is quite bloody. I agree savong private Ryan is gruesome, but I think Pearl Harbour is more gruesome and Windtalkers. Also Rambo 4 is.
It is not the atrocity of the German war crimes that causes them to be more emphasised than the Japanese', rather one key difference between the two countries: their attitudes. While Germany has admitted to, and apologised for, the horrific war crimes committed against the Jews in World War II; Japan, on the other hand, fails to acknowledge that they (along with Germany) started the war, & Japanese history textbooks suggest that the attack on Pearl Harbour and much of the Asia-Pacific region were not the start of the war in the Asia-Pacific region, but a result of actions taken by other nations. And while Germany has humbled itself & apologised, Japan has yet to show such signs of humility & continues to hide details & responsibilities about their war crimes.
Removed from the throne and prosecuted for war crimes .
No, the Nuremberg trials were specifically for prosecuting German war criminals. Japanese war criminals were tried separately in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, also known as the Tokyo trials, which held Japanese individuals accountable for their actions during World War II.
Yes, it is slightly gruesome in parts as it is a novel about a war, but it is also a very good story.