Yes. On a scale of just how wrong could international politics be it is right at the top. But that is only obvious in hindsight, at the time its intention was the maintenance of peace, and that is no bad thing, however Hitler, correctly, saw it as a sign of weakness and was dismissive of the results. The main problem was not appeasement in itself, it was the disarmament that accompanied it, both Britain & France were terribly unprepared for war in 1939 & it was only the English Channel that prevented Britain sharing the same fate of defeat & occupation suffered by the French.
USA and Russia were viewed by many as 'super powers'. Their relationship was antagonistic.
John Foster Dulles criticized the policy of containment as unsound because he believed it failed to address the aggressive nature of communism. He argued that merely containing communism would not stop its spread; instead, it needed to be actively confronted and rolled back. Dulles advocated for a more assertive approach, promoting the idea of "massive retaliation" and the need for a strong military response to deter communist expansion. He viewed containment as insufficient in achieving U.S. strategic goals during the Cold War.
The general consensus is that he was a monster, a quintessentially evil person.
Military draft in the Civil War often led to widespread resistance and opposition. Many people viewed the draft as unfair and unjust, especially because it disproportionately affected the poor and working-class individuals who could not afford to pay for a substitute. There were instances of draft riots and draft evasion, further highlighting the discontent and unrest caused by the draft.
The ANZACs (Australian and New Zealand Army Corps) played a significant role in World War I, particularly during the Gallipoli Campaign, but they did not achieve their primary objective of securing the Dardanelles. The campaign is often viewed as a costly failure, with heavy losses and little strategic gain. However, the ANZACs' bravery and sacrifice contributed to the broader Allied victory in the war, which concluded in 1918. Thus, while they did not win the specific battles they fought, their efforts were part of an eventual Allied success.
Hitler viewed the policy of appeasement as a sign of weakness and believed it allowed him to expand his power without facing resistance from other countries.
Adolf Hitler viewed appeasement as a sign of weakness and took advantage of it to further his aggressive expansionist goals in Europe.
Hitler viewed appeasement as a sign of weakness and took advantage of it to further his aggressive expansionist goals during World War II.
Adolf Hitler viewed appeasement as a sign of weakness and believed it allowed him to expand his power and influence without facing significant opposition. He took advantage of appeasement policies to further his aggressive expansionist goals in Europe.
A lot of people were against appeasement because it was viewed as giving Hitler what he wanted. Many felt that by continuing to give him what he wanted, his demands would escalate and he would perceive the other world leaders as weak and easily manipulated.
unimportant
unimportant
The appearance of a flat horizon when viewed from a distance is caused by the curvature of the Earth.
No, unless you want to go against Facebook's private policy.
refraction
"holy wow have you viewed this" is a app, so you can go to your privacy policy and remove unwanted apps, after you will be fine, and tell about this to others.
It gave African American men the right to vote, but ignore the rights of women.