It contradicted the power of Congress to declare war.
Northern states who could use the lands to create colleges serving all US servants
The Whig Party (whose final collapse was the result of the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 - since Southern Whigs joined the Democrats in supporting it, but Northern Whigs opposed it)
They shipped materials to northern markets
he was denided the spurim cort diecided he was not free and if you trying to do social studies this is not going to be right
It made it possible for slavery to be allowed in more areas.
The Abolitionist objection was that it could allow new slave-states. But most Northerners were not Abolitionists, and were quite favourable to Stephen Douglas and his principle of Popular Sovereignty.
nonconstitutional objections
no taxation without representation
taxation without representation A+
That a attorney made a legal objection and the Judge agreed to that
It might allow slavery in states North of the Missouri line - the parallel that had been accepted as the 'line in the sand' for so long, and which had kept the peace for thirty years.it made it possible for slavery to be allowed in more ares-apex
The Sugar Act was hated by colonists because most of them were very poor. This act required taxes to be paid on many popular items.
I have an objection to the vagueness of your "question."
The northern industrialists generally frowned upon the Indian Removal Act.
Crumlin and Ballycastle, but no mining is done there because there has been much objection to mining starting here for obvious reasons.
Patrick Henry's objection to the Stamp Act was articulated during a speech at the Virginia House of Burgesses in May 1765. He argued against the act's imposition of direct taxes on the colonies without their consent, famously asserting that only colonial assemblies had the right to tax the colonies. His passionate opposition helped galvanize colonial resistance to British taxation policies.