0
What was the number of Roman legions that Augustus Caesar had to reduce as part of his Pax Romana?
ChuckSiata
The number of Roman legions under arms was over 66. Augustus needed to reduce this number and still provide protection to the empire.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the atomic number of potacium?
Pottasium is a meta element. Atomic number of it is 19.
Write out atomic number for lithuim?
Lithium is a metal element. Atomic number of it is 1.
Soldier boys fan number?
If u want his number go ask him or stalk him...thats what i did and it worked i got his number!! yay but i an't gonna tell u cause u gotta go through the same thing i did to get his number!!! yay
A number that can only be divided by itself it is calledd a?
A prime number can only be divided evenly by itself and one.
What is the number of soldiers in the confederate army?
No accurate number is known. Estimates range from 600,000 to 1 million.
In the history of Rome what was the Pax Romana?
The Pax Romana was the long period of relative peace and minimal expansion. It also included during the time of Augustus, a downsizing of the number of legions.
How manu legions rome had?
The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.The number of legions and their strengths differed at different times, so the following is the data on the legions under Augustus. After defeating Marc Antony, Octavian/Augustus had about 60 legions as he not only had his own legions and the ones stationed on the far European borders, but he also took over Antony's legions. Needless to say many were disbanded or combined with other legions. Augustus pared down the military until he had 28 legions of 150,000 men. These legionaries were aided by about 180,000 auxiliary infantry and cavalry.
Who was more successful Julius Caesar of Augustus?
This questions has several layers to it. I'll approach it head on without dealing with any side issues. Augustus Caesar was more successful than his uncle, Julius Caesar. I am defining "success" as it affects ancient Rome. Augustus united the empire in a way Julius Caesar could not. Augustus swept away all opposition and created what is now called the Pax Romana. Augustus ( in relative terms ) brought a good degree of peace & prosperity during his life time and the affects lingered on for another 200 years. With sole power he could invest large amounts of money to build public works, reform the bureaucracy and reduce the number of legions under arms. Julius Caesar's life was cut short. When he controlled Rome, defectors worked on his demise. Due to time, he had not enough of it to crush his opposition. Thus he was unable to come close to his nephews accomplishments.
What was Julius Caesar's army called?
Julius Caesar's army had no particular name as a whole. A Roman army was simply called a Legion or a number of Legions. However all legions were numbered and sometimes granted a name if they were especially valiant. Caesar's Ninth and Tenth Legions were particularly famous.
How many legions did Caesar have?
When Caesar ignored the senate's order to disband his army and crossed the river Rubicon to march on Rome, he had one legion, the Legio XIII Gemina. His soldiers werebattlehardened veterans for his wars inGaul He then gathered more of his veterans. When he went to Hispania to fight the forces of the opposition there with 6 legions, 3,000 cavalry and his personal bodyguard of 900 cavalrymen. He took three legions to fight Pompey inGreece. When he went to fight opposition armies in Tunisia he had 10 legions. At the final battle of this civil war at Munda in Spain he had 8 legions. In each of thebattlesof this war,Caesar'stroops were outnumbered.
Why did the Roman people welcome Agustus's rule?
For decades prior to the rise of Augustus, the Roman Republic had a number of civil wars, internal strife and political instability. The rule of Augustus promised at least some political stability and as he was also the legal son of Julius Caesar and the fact that J. Caesar was deified, Augustus was also an important religious figure as the 'son of a god.'
Who led the Roman army?
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
How did gaius Caesar die?
Gaius Caesar is not usually known by his praenomen "Gaius"; he is more commonly known as Julius Caesar. He was of course stabbed by a number of conspirators. But there are other Gaius Caesars. One was the grandson of Augustus who died of a wound while on campaign in Armenia. The most notorious Gaius Caesar was the man we know as Caligula. He was assassinated.
How many Romans soldier?
In the time of Augustus Rome had 28 Legions with 5,000 soldiers a Legion this meant there were roughly 140,000 Roman Legionaries with a similar number of Auxiliaries the total numbers in the Roman army would have been about 280,000.
What did Augustus do to take astand?
Augustus took a stand by fighting and winning a number of civil wars. The result of these victories was that he became the first Roman emperor. Augustus' first victory was in a civil war was against the armies of the assassins of Caesar, Brutus and Cassius, (the Liberators' civil war 44-42 BC) which he fought together with Mark Antony, the second one was against a rebellion (the Sicilian revolt, 44-36 BC) by the son of Pompey the Great the man who had fought against Julius Caesar in Caesar's Civil War (49-45 BC), the third one was against the brother and the wife of Mark Antony (the Perusine War, 41-40 BC) and the fourth one was against Mark Antony himself and his ally, Cleopatra VII of Egypt (the Final War of the Roman Republic, 32-30 BC). After these victories, Augustus controlled all the legions (armies) including those which had fought against him. This, as well as the enormous wealth he accumulated through the spoils of war of his military victories (originally Augustus was not very rich) is what gave him the muscle to impose himself as an absolute ruler.
How many legions were in an army?
There was no set number of legions in a Roman army. The number of legions in an army was the number of legions given to the general. Some campaigns only needed one legion while others required several. They were both armies.
How big was Julius Caesar's empire?
It's impossible to give an accurate head count of Caesar's army. It would all depend on how many legions he had with him in his various wars. Now a legion, at least on paper, consisted of 5,000 men, but most of the time they were greatly undermanned. So if Caesar had, for example, five legions, he would technically have 25,000 men. But the reality of the situation could very well be half that number.
