because weaponised machinery had not been used on such a large scale before as it had been in ww1?
New weapons had been developed and the armies were still using some old ways to fight.
Very few women 'fought' in World War 1. Over 30 million men fought, & more than 8 million men died.
It was fought in more than one country. Bosnia-herzegovina, Austria,Germany, France, and Belgium mostly
No, there were alot of countries that fought in WW2. There was Germany and Japan; and than England, Russia, US, Canada, France (?)
world war 2 was more of a world war. It was fought on more fronts and included more countries.
New weapons had been developed and the armies were still using some old ways to fight.
Mr. Strack's would be more than dissapointed.
Very few women 'fought' in World War 1. Over 30 million men fought, & more than 8 million men died.
The north differed from the south in that it's economy was based on industry, rather than agriculture.
It was fought in more than one country. Bosnia-herzegovina, Austria,Germany, France, and Belgium mostly
in 1923
There were far more than 2
No, there were alot of countries that fought in WW2. There was Germany and Japan; and than England, Russia, US, Canada, France (?)
world war 2 was more of a world war. It was fought on more fronts and included more countries.
WW I was bigger than previous wars, because all the powerful nations of the world were involved on one side or the other, in two vast, opposed alliances (the Triple Entente vs. the Central Powers). No previous war had involved the whole world.
so many people fought and because the generals used attrition instead of tactics
It would either be the slaves back in the imperial days and before or those who fought in the world wars but they fought to maintain freedom more than claim it