That question is best summed up by "Too little, too late". In the mid late Thirties Chamberlain started to rearm Great Britain but it was quite literally "Too little , too late" as Hitler had the jump on Great Britain by about 5 to 10 years both in gearing up for production but also technologically as well. granted the Brit's did invent radar to help fend off air bombardments , but the Germans were way ahead with jet and nuclear technology as well as better designs in almost every category when it came to weaponry. For example the German were able to aerial bombard London and other strategic sites at will with Rockets where as Great Britain barley had planes enough to semi-defend herself. had it not been for the U.S. intervention Great Britain would be speaking German today as would the whole of Europe.
Neville Chamberlain
Because Churchill was a better military strategist than Chamberlain.
Britain was declared to be at war by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain on September 3, 1939. This announcement followed Germany's invasion of Poland, which prompted Britain and France to respond by declaring war on Germany. Chamberlain addressed the nation via radio, marking the beginning of Britain's involvement in World War II.
On September 3, 1939, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain announced on the radio that Britain was at war with Germany. This declaration followed Germany's invasion of Poland, which prompted Britain and France to fulfill their commitments to support Poland. Chamberlain's address marked the beginning of Britain's involvement in World War II.
To rearm
The horror of WW1 made both countries reluctant to rearm.
The address of the Chamberlain Branch Library is: 120 Newington Ave, New Britain, 06051 2119
Neville Chamberlain was Prime Minister of Great Britain at the outbreak of World War 2.
Neville Chamberlain
Neville Chamberlain was.
Neville Chamberlain
1937-1940.
Neville Chamberlain
Winston Churchill
pooped
Prime minister of Britain
According to Chamberlain, some people opposed the policy of appeasement because they believed it encouraged further aggression from totalitarian regimes, particularly Nazi Germany. Critics argued that making concessions would undermine collective security and embolden dictators, ultimately leading to greater conflict. They feared that appeasement would not only fail to maintain peace but also betray democratic values and allies. Chamberlain, however, believed it was a necessary strategy to buy time for Britain to rearm and prepare for potential war.