Russian t-34 because their attack and speed was better but the tiger tank was slow and their attack was almost the same as Russian the tiger tank had better armor
A Tiger tank commander who destroyed dozens of American and british tanks and almost a hundred Russian T/34
The comparison between a Panzer tank and a Tiger tank depends on various factors such as the context of their use, the specific model, and the tactical requirements of a given situation. Here's a brief overview of each: Panzer Tank: Panzer tanks were widely used by the German military throughout World War II and were known for their reliability, versatility, and relatively lower production costs compared to more advanced tanks like the Tiger. They played a significant role in various campaigns and battles, offering mobility and firepower to German armored units. Tiger Tank: The Tiger tank, specifically the Tiger I, was a heavy tank used by the German army during World War II. It was renowned for its formidable armor, powerful 88mm gun, and heavy firepower, making it a feared opponent on the battlefield. However, Tiger tanks were also more expensive to produce and maintain compared to other tanks like the Panzer IV. While the Tiger tank offered superior firepower and protection, its weight and mechanical complexity sometimes led to mobility issues, especially in challenging terrain. In summary, the choice between a Panzer tank and a Tiger tank would depend on factors such as the specific requirements of a mission, the availability of resources, and the strategic objectives of the military command. Both types of tanks had their strengths and weaknesses, and each played a significant role in the German armored forces during World War II. We have made a video about the Panzer IV tank, which can be seen on our YouTube channel @FunkyHistory
Probably the best tanks built during WWII were the German Panzerkampfwagen Tiger tanks, Panzer IV, and the Panther. The Soviet T-34 was a very formable tank against the Germans so the Tigers were built. T-34, Tiger 1, Tiger 2, Panzer IV, and Panther to name five. British Cruiser MK VI Crusader
Only about 1,300 Tiger tanks were manufactured. In contrast the US built 88,000 Sherman tanks, and relied on vast numerical superiority to offset the tremendous qualitative edge enjoyed by the Tiger and Panther tanks of Germany.
The Sherman tank. Unfortunately, it was smaller and less heavily armed than the German Tiger tank and would be easily defeated in a frontal assault. However, US tankers learned to ambush the Tiger and maneuver around to the side and back which was less heavily armored and destroy them that way.
In a tank on tank encounter, I'd want to be in the Tiger.
Tiger tanks: 1,200+ King tiger tanks: 497
There were several famous German Tanks. One of them was the Panzer, another was the Tiger tank, and lastly, the modern-day German tank is the Leopard II.
On some of the Tiger Tanks, they'll carry a 88 Flak Gun.
A Tiger tank commander who destroyed dozens of American and british tanks and almost a hundred Russian T/34
THE KING TIGER TANKS MAIN BATTLE WAS THE BATTLE OF THE BULGE
t1:german tiger 1 t2:german tiger 2 t1:armor 69 t2:armor 89 t1:speed 14 mph t2:speed 20 mph t1:gun is 98% great t2:gun is 99% good so german tiger 2 is better
The comparison between a Panzer tank and a Tiger tank depends on various factors such as the context of their use, the specific model, and the tactical requirements of a given situation. Here's a brief overview of each: Panzer Tank: Panzer tanks were widely used by the German military throughout World War II and were known for their reliability, versatility, and relatively lower production costs compared to more advanced tanks like the Tiger. They played a significant role in various campaigns and battles, offering mobility and firepower to German armored units. Tiger Tank: The Tiger tank, specifically the Tiger I, was a heavy tank used by the German army during World War II. It was renowned for its formidable armor, powerful 88mm gun, and heavy firepower, making it a feared opponent on the battlefield. However, Tiger tanks were also more expensive to produce and maintain compared to other tanks like the Panzer IV. While the Tiger tank offered superior firepower and protection, its weight and mechanical complexity sometimes led to mobility issues, especially in challenging terrain. In summary, the choice between a Panzer tank and a Tiger tank would depend on factors such as the specific requirements of a mission, the availability of resources, and the strategic objectives of the military command. Both types of tanks had their strengths and weaknesses, and each played a significant role in the German armored forces during World War II. We have made a video about the Panzer IV tank, which can be seen on our YouTube channel @FunkyHistory
Germany had the better tank (Tiger and King Tiger)but could not produce them on the same scale as the Russians produced the T-34 . Quality vs Quantity .
You have to be more specific. I don't know the total number of Tiger Tanks destroyed but if you look at the German's records, they list many of them destroyed or abandoned by their own men. This was probably due to the fact that the tanks used so much gas the Germans may have had to leave them behind after destroying them. Also, German equipment was so finely engineered that they were too complex to repair in the field. Or it may simply be a propaganda ploy so it would keep up the belief that their Tiger tanks were indestructable. So, do you mean how many Tigers were destroyed in combat?
Probably the best tanks built during WWII were the German Panzerkampfwagen Tiger tanks, Panzer IV, and the Panther. The Soviet T-34 was a very formable tank against the Germans so the Tigers were built. T-34, Tiger 1, Tiger 2, Panzer IV, and Panther to name five. British Cruiser MK VI Crusader
Only about 1,300 Tiger tanks were manufactured. In contrast the US built 88,000 Sherman tanks, and relied on vast numerical superiority to offset the tremendous qualitative edge enjoyed by the Tiger and Panther tanks of Germany.