The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states in part,
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,..."
japan
Chinese
When you strict or violate human rights, it means to take the basic rights of humanity away. Such as a home, electricity, food, drink and ect like that. Also, human rights is to do with treating someone as if they are bad, like dirt. So if you break one of those then you are violating human rights towards humans. Answer 2: Basic human rights are freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, expression, conscience and religion.
Any time a government authority (police, military, etc.) willfully intrudes into a person's home without a warrant/probable cause/or consent; or stops a person's freedom of movement (either on foot or a vehicle) without probable cause/consent/warrant; or stops a person from saying what's on his mind (within accepted reason)...is violating the US Constitution (bill of Rights)...e.g. Search and Seizer/Freedom of Speech Amendments, etc. It's presumed that only the US has such a constitution; guaranteeing certain individual rights (laws). These are amongst the most common complaints drawn from the citizen's of foreign nations.
They did not care about individual rights
It holds the rights to the accused of a speedy trial, an impartial jury, to be told of charges, and a lawyer.
A right to representation - to be faced with their accuser - and a fair and impartial trial by a jury of their peers.
Miranda Rights.
It depends on the legislation of the country concerned.
"Section 18(a). That in criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend, in person and by counsel; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation; to meet the witnesses against him face to face; to have process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his behalf; and a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county."
The right to a speedy and public trial, the right to an impartial jury of your peers, the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations against you, the right to be confronted by the witnesses against you, the right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in your favor, the right to assistance of counsel for your defense.
how did roman law protect the rights of an accused person?
Trial by impartial jury, speedy public trial, right to a lawyer, and right meet the lawyer against him/her.
the accused person
One reason why it's important to protect the rights of a person accused of a crime, is because the person might turn out to be innocent. The US Constitution guarantees the right to due process.
In the US, someone accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Under the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution, he is entitled to reasonable bail (if eligible), a right to counsel, a trial by a jury of his peers, and to be confronted with the witnesses against him. The accused cannot be forced to incriminate himself or to testify against himself.
These are rights intended for individuals accused for a crime.