answersLogoWhite

0

Totally Russia, Russian soldiers were giving their all, while America, Japan and other countries were sitting there, scratching their head about whether or not do something about it. Russian people were going, fighting with no army skill, sometimes even barefoot. Russian citizens were having there food stolen, family and friends, killed, their homes blasted, while America had only 1 time a bomb dropped on their soil. Now, I'm not saying that Russia did it alone, no. They had America and most of Europe. But Russia defended themselves to the end, and not only did they Chase Germans of their land, but they marched right over to Berlin an put their flag in the square. I'm saying this as a very proud Russian.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which axis country suffered the most casualties?

In World War 2, Germany suffered more casualties than either Italy or Japan. Only Russia and China suffered more casualties than Germany.


Which statement best summarizes Russia's experience on World War 1's Eastern Front?

Russian troops suffered huge casualties and eventually refused to continue fighting.


How many casualties were suffered by the US eighth Air Force in WW2?

AnswerAccording to all the websites that I have consulted, the 8th Air Force suffered more than 47 000 casualties, of whom more than 26 000 were killed. This was over half the casualties suffered by the entire USAAF in WW2.~ See related link below .


This country suffered more casualties than any other leading to revolution?

Russia


Which country suffered the most casualties during world war 1 central powers or allied?

more allies died in ww1. i am not exactly sure why. there is a breakdown of casualties on wikipedia.


What country suffered more casualties in world war 1?

Russia suffered the most casualties in World War I, with estimates of military and civilian deaths ranging from 1.8 to 2.5 million. The massive loss was due to several factors, including widespread battles on the Eastern Front, internal strife, and a lack of resources. Other countries, such as Germany and Austria-Hungary, also experienced significant casualties, but Russia's losses were the highest overall.


Who suffered more casualties the union of the confederate?

the union. about 350,000 on the union side about 250,000 on the confederate side


Between the world war 1 and world war 2 who had more combat deaths?

In both wars Russia suffered the most casualties. 2.4 million Russians killed in WW1 and 21.7 million in WW2.


Who had more casualties the north or the south How many more did they have?

According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.


Who had more casualties the north or the south how many more they have?

According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.


In World War 1 how many Anzac were casualties?

During World War I, the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) suffered significant casualties, with approximately 60,000 Australians and around 18,000 New Zealanders losing their lives. Additionally, many more were wounded, with total Australian casualties estimated at around 150,000 and New Zealand casualties at about 40,000. These figures highlight the heavy toll that the war took on both nations.


Is it true that American casualties were more in world war 1?

Compared to what? Total American casualties in WW1 were significantly lower than either WW2 or the US Civil War, and the casualty rate (number of casualties suffered per 100,000 deployed) was lower than most wars Americans fought in during the 1800s. American casualty rates were comparable to (though slightly higher than) British or French rates during the same time period.