poor military leadership
The easiest anwser is that the North had technology, shear number of troops, and industry on their side. The South had much better generals, a more willingness to fight, and that the war was fought in their back yard
superior military leaders is the answer that i had to asnwer.. but there ar many answers basically everything that the south had an advntage off was not for the north.
The south every time you smelly, tracksuit wearing northeners!
They had good leadership skills and generals. Also, most of the battles were fought in the South so they knew their land better than the North, and they had heart because they wanted to win so that they could keep their way of life which was slavery.
The North maintained a strong military leadership and the South reached for economic growth.
The only advantage that the South had, at first, was military leadership
poor military leadership
South had no government. The North was established and had the United States constitution as well as the leadership of the president, a military, and congress.
Both North and South Korea have Presidents, but the leadership in North Korea is dynastic.
There's 1 school in North Carolina and 1 in South Carolina. The one in North Carolina is called Oak Ridge Military Academy and is located in Oak Ridge, North Carolina. The one in South Carolina is called Camden Military Academy and is located in Camden, South Carolina.
Check a book
The North Korean leadership would simply never accept that.
The North was more industrialized then the south.
North- More troops Better equipped and supplied South- Knew the land better Had better generals
None. North Vietnam's leadership started it when they began "infiltrating" their forces into South Vietnam in 1955. North American (US) leadership simply responded to it.
The North had a better rail system then the north, The south used more rivers then rails in the civil war