I think they were hoping for a less bloody alternative to the knee-jerk response of automatic war which preceded World War 1. If they had been dealing with a more conventional government than that of Hitler and the Nazis it might have worked, but in retrospect the weakness of the appeasement policy is clearly seen. Yes, the above is true: It needs to be remembered that WW1 was fresh in the memory. The idea that another World War would in fact be so much worse was wholly unimaginable. The appeal of Not fighting was thought to be a viable prospect. Hindsight is a very desirable commodity !
It was a vain attempt to avoid a repitition of what had gone before, that is WW1. Unfortunately the thinking was that Hitler was a man of principle. But I think it has to be borne in mind that those in power in the late 1930s were very much aware of what had happened in Europe just 20 years before. Hindsight shows that Appeasement was simply wrong, but they were not to know that at the time. As the saying goes in diplomacy, speak softly & carry a big stick.....
They thought giving Hitker what he wanted ( the action of appeasment) would prevent another world war.
Because the last thing they wanted was to have another war started with them caught in the middle.
munich conference
Britain and France gave in to Hitler's demands for the Sudetenland. Czechoslovakia was not present at this conference, and it should be noted that this land contained key heavy industries, as well as 3 million GermansIn September 1938 Germany, Britain, France, and Italy met in Munich to decide what action, if any, to take concerning German demands for territory in Czechoslovakia. This conference came to be known as the Munich Conference. While there, Britain and France decided to allow Germany to annex the areas near the German border (the Sudetenland). Hitler said that it was his "final demand" in Europe.The action of Britain and France is regarded as appeasement.
The four countries of Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain composed and signed the Munich Pact in Munich, Germany on September 29, 1938. The forming of the pact between these four countries served as appeasement purposes, securing Great Britain's and France's agreement to Adolf Hitler's Demands. The Pact, signed by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain for Great Britain, Premier Edouard Paladier for France, Adolf Hitler for Germany, and Benito Mussolini for Italy, set October 1, 1938 as the date of Czechoslovakian evacuation of the territory
Munich Agreement
Neville Chamberlain, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Eduoard Daladier signed the Munich Agreement. Chamberlain was prime minister of the UK, Daladier of France, and Mussolini of Italy, which was Germany's Axis ally.
The Munich Agreement .
munich conference
Appeasement.
The Munich Agreement was signed in Munich , Germany .
Munich Conference
The Munich Agreement .
It allowed Hitler to keep invading countries because he knew Britain, Italy and France would not stop him (because of the Munich Agreement).
The Munich agreement in 29 September 1938.
The Munich Agreement was significant because Britain and France believed that by handing Sudetenland back to Germany was the only way to save the world from another war.
false
The portion of Czechoslovakia, called the Sudetenland had a large German population. The Munich Agreement caused the annexation of this territory to the German nation.
Britain and France gave in to Hitler's demands for the Sudetenland. Czechoslovakia was not present at this conference, and it should be noted that this land contained key heavy industries, as well as 3 million GermansIn September 1938 Germany, Britain, France, and Italy met in Munich to decide what action, if any, to take concerning German demands for territory in Czechoslovakia. This conference came to be known as the Munich Conference. While there, Britain and France decided to allow Germany to annex the areas near the German border (the Sudetenland). Hitler said that it was his "final demand" in Europe.The action of Britain and France is regarded as appeasement.