I don't think the assumption made in the question is accurate.
Following the Kristallnacht the British government eased some of the restrictions on allowing refugees from Nazi Germany to enter the U.K. This was done for humanitarian reasons and in response to pressure from public opinion. This is not the same thing as saying that people 'turned away' from appeasement.
Generally, historians see the Nazi seizure, in March 1939, of the 'rump' of Czechoslovakia left after the annexation of the Sudetenland as the key turning-point in attitudes towards appeasement. Within two weeks Neville Chamberlain gave Poland a verbal guarantee of assistance if it was attacked by Germany (though the actual treaty with Poland was not worked out till later); and in April 1939 the British parliament passed legislation for the reintroduction of conscription (compulsory military service). This was the first time that Britain introduced conscription in peace time.
No they didnt they ran away
From the area was close enough to the British to keep their raiding and forging parties out of the interior of Pennsylvania. But far enough away to halt the threat of British surprise attacks.
knights protected people by keeping the enemy away from the city or body guarding there serfs
slaves ran away from plantation to join the Union.
He was out gunned. He had more people, but they had horses and guns.
The British took peoples friends and families away from them and took money away from people
Enslaved people were seeking liberty
Enslaved people were seeking liberty
Appeasement.
The enslaved people were seeking liberty.
Enslaved people were seeking liberty
The idea of appeasing your enemy to keep him at arms length away from you is a good idea in theory to protect yourself. But, enemies do not always stay appeased. Appeasement does not really work if the enemy is not appeased as in the case of Adolf Hitler. He went against every nation that tried the appeasement tactic with him.
Enslaved people were seeking liberty
Among populations, in general terms, yes -- at least, there is no enmity between British and Mexican people. Mexicans are too far away and too involved on their own affairs to have a meaningful relationship with British people.
The British took away French rebels to be guillotined. A good book about the French revolution is "A Tale of Two Cities."
When I was born, I was a Canadian citizen and a British subject. The British government took away my right to be a British subject.
The Axis Powers rolled their military forces through countries. Politics were swept away.