They kill more soldiers
Machine-gunner crews were often more vulnerable to enemy fire and capture because they typically operated heavy weaponry that was critical to their unit's defensive and offensive capabilities, making them high-value targets. When captured, their role in inflicting casualties on the enemy could lead to a harsher response, as they were seen as more directly responsible for enemy losses. Additionally, the nature of their position often left them less mobile and more exposed during combat, increasing their likelihood of being killed if captured rather than simply taken prisoner like foot soldiers.
Machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than the foot soldiers because then they will lose more experienced soldiers and will lose effect of the use of the machine gun in the battle.
Machine gun crews were likely to be killed by enemy foot soldiers if captured due to the strategic threat they posed on the battlefield. Machine guns could inflict significant casualties and disrupt enemy advances, making their operators prime targets. Capturing such crews could also demoralize the opposing forces, but allowing them to live could risk them being used for intelligence or retribution. Consequently, enemy soldiers might feel compelled to eliminate this threat permanently.
Osama Bin Laden was captured in the city of Abattobad, Pakistan. They captured him, then they shot and killed him inside a private residential compound.
Several US Seals were killed, but most survived, during the execution of Osama.
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
Machine-gunner crews were often more vulnerable to enemy fire and capture because they typically operated heavy weaponry that was critical to their unit's defensive and offensive capabilities, making them high-value targets. When captured, their role in inflicting casualties on the enemy could lead to a harsher response, as they were seen as more directly responsible for enemy losses. Additionally, the nature of their position often left them less mobile and more exposed during combat, increasing their likelihood of being killed if captured rather than simply taken prisoner like foot soldiers.
Machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than the foot soldiers because then they will lose more experienced soldiers and will lose effect of the use of the machine gun in the battle.
He was not captured- he killed himself.
the captured where tortured and killed
He didn't get captured. He knew that he was going to get captured so he killed himself before it happened.
He didn't get captured. He knew that he was going to get captured so he killed himself before it happened.
He was captured and killed.
he was captured by cortez and slayed
no, he killed himself
Being captured and killed