Machine-gunner crews were often more vulnerable to enemy fire and capture because they typically operated heavy weaponry that was critical to their unit's defensive and offensive capabilities, making them high-value targets. When captured, their role in inflicting casualties on the enemy could lead to a harsher response, as they were seen as more directly responsible for enemy losses. Additionally, the nature of their position often left them less mobile and more exposed during combat, increasing their likelihood of being killed if captured rather than simply taken prisoner like foot soldiers.
They kill more soldiers
Machine gun crews were likely to be killed by enemy foot soldiers if captured due to the strategic threat they posed on the battlefield. Machine guns could inflict significant casualties and disrupt enemy advances, making their operators prime targets. Capturing such crews could also demoralize the opposing forces, but allowing them to live could risk them being used for intelligence or retribution. Consequently, enemy soldiers might feel compelled to eliminate this threat permanently.
Generally, in wartime, spies know that if captured, spies of any nation in any war are likely to be shot. They are not often captured, however, and if captured are often not executed.
Machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than the foot soldiers because then they will lose more experienced soldiers and will lose effect of the use of the machine gun in the battle.
The Gestapo killed about 6 million Jews including gypsies, homosexuals, russians ---------------------------------------------------- The Gestapo were part of the police, the people that they killed had nothing to do with the Holocaust. They killed some under tourtue and executed some, most likely the figure is in the thousands. The 6 million Jews and the others were killed mainly by the SS, and also by the army.
They kill more soldiers
He would have most likely been captured, tried, and publicly executed.
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
If he wasn't killed in the final battle, which given that he wasn't mentioned among the dead is likely, then he was probably captured by the Ministry and sent to Azkaban.
I was
Machine gun crews were likely to be killed by enemy foot soldiers if captured due to the strategic threat they posed on the battlefield. Machine guns could inflict significant casualties and disrupt enemy advances, making their operators prime targets. Capturing such crews could also demoralize the opposing forces, but allowing them to live could risk them being used for intelligence or retribution. Consequently, enemy soldiers might feel compelled to eliminate this threat permanently.
You would likely be killed BY a guillotine if placed IN a guillotine.
Pass out x
It is believed that Phobos was most likely a captured asteroid.
Generally, in wartime, spies know that if captured, spies of any nation in any war are likely to be shot. They are not often captured, however, and if captured are often not executed.
Boudica likely committed suicide.