answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, because nearly all the battles were in the South, and in the last stages, Sherman was waging 'total war' on civilians.

However, after Grant ended prisoner-exchanges, the Union prisoners in Andersonville suffered extreme privations, worse than anything the Confederate prisoners experienced in Northern jails.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

This shortage would cause devastating consequences for the south during the civil war?

Industrial manufacturing capacity


The civil war was more devastating in the south than in the north because...?

Most of the major battles were fought in the South (with the exception of a few battles fought in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Vermont). The South lost the war, which didn't help. General Sherman torn up the South in Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina.


Who had more waterways in the civil war?

the south.


Why was the civil war more devastating in the south rather north?

Yes, because nearly all the battles were in the South, and the war wrecked the Southern economy, bringing great privations. But these privations included starvation for Union prisoners in Southern camps, so it devastated Northern families too.


Why was the civil war more devasting in the south than the north?

Most of the major battle in the Civil War were fought in the South (except for a few in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Vermont). The South lost the war.


The civil was more devastating in the south than in the north because?

Most of the major battles were fought in the South (with the exception of a few battles fought in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Vermont). The South lost the war, which didn't help. General Sherman torn up the South in Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina.


What is a southern term used to refer to the civil war?

The civil war.In the south, many referred to the Civil War as "The War of Secession". They wanted to secede from the Union, to be independent from the United States. To the south it was not a civil war.Read more: What_are_terms_commonly_used_to_refer_to_the_Civil_War


Who had more farms in the Civil War the North or the South?

the north


Did the north or south have more money in the civil war?

The North.


Why was the war so much devastating to the south than to the north?

The Civil War was more devastating to the South than to the North primarily due to the fact that most of the battles were fought on Southern soil, leading to widespread destruction of infrastructure, homes, and farms. The Southern economy, which relied heavily on agriculture, was further crippled by the loss of labor from enslaved people who were freed during the war. Additionally, the North had greater industrial resources and a more extensive railway network, allowing it to sustain its war efforts more effectively than the South. The combined effect of these factors resulted in a far greater toll on the South, both physically and economically.


What is a good hook on an essay about the civil war?

The Civil War, a devastating and tragic event in United States' history, can never be forgotten.


In what ways was the civil war devastating to the nation?

The Civil war was devastating to the United States because brothers and neighbors turned on to each other and butchered each other. The country also suffered economically.