0
do you think conflict with north and south could have been resolved without the civil war?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
No, the north and south had been gearing for war for almost a century. The dam had to burst sometime.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoyes(obviously)
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the outcome of the conflict along the east coast early in the civil war?
Neither side could gain a clear and decisive victory.
How were whites affected by the civil war?
Whites were affected because they could no longer have slaves. Slaves provided them with the majority of their income. Without slaves, many white lost their wealth.
Who did the british fight in the civil war?
They came close to fighting the Union, after the US Navy fired across the bows of a British mail-ship carrying two Confederate envoys to Europe. (Interestingly, the violent disagreement was resolved by the dying Prince Albert at Windsor, by editing the message that the Foreign Office was due to send to Lincoln's Secreary of State.) After that, the British did build blockade-runners to aid the Confederates, but after the Emancipation Proclamation, they could not do this openly without looking pro-slavery.
What position could a black man hold in the civil war union army?
He could be a seargent.
One thing the civil war proved was that?
The Civil War proved that the states could survive even fighting each other.
What are some ways the conflict could be resolved?
Some ways to resolve conflict include communication, compromise, and seeking mediation. Open and honest dialogue can help identify the root of the issue and find a solution that works for all parties involved. If necessary, a neutral third party can help facilitate discussions and guide towards a resolution.
How could a conflict be resolved by local people?
yes
Conflict between opposing groups of citizens of the same country?
If it is an armed conflict, it is called a civil war. If it has not been reduced to organized violence, it could be a riot, or merely politics.
Which is a nation that did not take sides and could sail the sea without fear of conflict?
A neutral nation that did not take sides could sail the sea without fear of conflict.
How could have Achilles and agamemnon resolved their conflict?
Achilles and Agamemnon could have resolved their conflict by communicating openly and respectfully with one another to address each other's grievances. They could have also utilized a neutral mediator to help facilitate discussions and find a compromise that satisfies both parties. Lastly, they could have focused on the bigger picture of winning the Trojan War and set aside their personal differences for the greater good of the Greek army.
How do you reply to 'describe a situation where you had a conflict with a co-worker' during a job interview?
Depends on the conflict.You could say that you should try to be diplomatic,cool and judge by the facts.
How was the northerners wanting to free slaves but the south wanting to keep them so they could do there work resolved?
they endede up having the civil war and the north won
Why did the democrats clamor for a truce from the civil war?
Many northern democrats felt that the war could be resolved through diplomatic means, and that the bloodshed had gone on too long.
Which IRQ could you probably assign to a NIC without causing a conflict?
9, 10 and 11
What was the outcome of the conflict along the east coast early in the civil war?
Neither side could gain a clear and decisive victory.
What are civic conflicts?
They would be problems within a country. They could leave to a civil war if two sides split on an issue and it comes to conflict.
Can a civil suit change to arbitration?
It is possible that a civil suit could be either voluntarily dismissed without prejudice to being reinstated or put on hold at the request of the parties and with consent of the court in order to permit the parties to have the matter resolved through arbitration. In addition many courts now have some form of pre-trial non-binding alternative dispute resolution processes.
