Yes. In general, a minor can be sued if he or she behaved negligently, meaning that he had a duty of care, and his conduct fell below the standard of care, causing damages to someone.
Recklessness is considered a more severe breach of the duty of care than negligence. Think of it this way - if negligence is a failure to exercise due care, recklessness is the failure to exercise any care.
Minors are generally held to the standard of a reasonable child of similar age, education, and intelligence. If it's found that such a hypothetical reasonable child would have been more careful, the minor will be liable for whatever damage he or she caused.
Parents are legally and financially responsible for their minor children until they reach the legal age of majority for the state in which they live or a court rules otherwise. Those responsibilities include but are not limited to, basic care of food, shelter, clothing, medical care and educational requirements; supervision in areas of the minor child 's school attendance, obeyance of the law, and so forth.
It depends upon the circumstances of the physical encounter. If the minor initiated the fight then the young adult would simply be defending themselves. Missouri as most US states can charge and prosecute a 17-year-old as an adult if the situation warrants.
Mike Minor sang the theme song for "Petticoat Junction" during its original run from 1963 to 1970. He performed the song for the show's first three seasons, and his rendition became closely associated with the series. The show had multiple theme songs, but Minor's version is the most recognized.
Yes. A minor can be arrested for groping another minor.
the minor characters are x-ray
Yes, a minor can sue for damages in a legal case, but they typically require a guardian or representative to act on their behalf in court.
if he gets caught he could be charged with contributing to the deliquency of a minor... reckless endangerment of a minor or even worse if you got a gung -ho D.A.
Actually, I think her parents are responsible for any damages because she a minor, so the parents the ones who will be sued or have to pay for any damages of the minor child.
if the child is near the liqour yes but if your in a booth then no
It being your fault, you should pay for all damages.
from what I understand...their is some noticable damage there but, it's minor.
no he is fine there were minor damages to his car
Tito is a minor character in the novel "The House on Mango Street" by Sandra Cisneros. He is a young boy who resides in the same neighborhood as the protagonist, Esperanza. Tito is known for his reckless behavior and is often seen causing mischief.
Parents
Fly Minor irritation. -swarm Many minor irritations.
It is not against the law unless you are serving a minor. What a host should be concerned about is the potential liability. In some states, over-serving an already intoxicated guest is considered reckless behavior. You need to check the laws and regulations in your state for an answer to that. Liability issues concern the guest's behavior if he leaves your home in a drunken state. If he causes an accident and hurts himself or others or damages property, you have some responsibility for that. Again, in varies by state. Regardless of the law, it is common sense and social responsibility to control alcohol consumption in your home for everyone's sake and safety.
Im sure a right and wrong party can be identified. But is it really worth it? If damages are so minimum and you and the other party can agree to take care of your own damages, then I say its a good idea.