It depends on the circumstance.
A police officer cannot randomly search a person for no reason; however, there are many situations in which an officer can search without a warrant.
Among those is probable cause and exigent (or emergency) circumstances.
An officer, also, has the ability to do an outer-clothing patdown if they have reasonable suspicion that an individual is armed (Terry v. Ohio, Terry Stop, or Stop and Frisk).
An officer, also, has the ability to conduct a search of the suspect after an arrest has been made (Search Incident to Lawful Arrest).
Generally police can respond to a complaint and investigate its validity. If they find reasonable cause they may investigate further. But they may not enter a premises without the consent of the owner or without a search warrant. Having found reasonable cause they may request a search warrant. If they get it, then they may "intervene." But this scenario is based on the assumption that police follow every step of due process. That isn't always the case. And often suspects don't know their rights. So unwittingly suspects may give police more information than they need to.
In the general context of the question, the answer is yes, however consult a Lawyer for specifics to your case. Basically, what makes a search legal in Canada is the existence of Probable Cause to believe either that a crime is in progress or that the search will turn up evidence pertinent to an investigation. There are occasions when probable cause can be deemed to exist, allowing a police officer to search a person, item or premises without a warrant, and there are occasions when an officer requires either consent or a warrant to search. Examples where police do not require a search warrant: -The police are looking for a missing woman and knock on your door as part of a neighborhood canvass. Visible over your shoulder, lying on the floor, is a woman. -During a traffic stop, a strong odor of marijuana is wafting from your car -A fleeing suspect runs into a home -There is an immediate danger to life or property if they are not permitted to conduct the search (such as a house on fire). Notes: -Unrelated evidence turned up while conducting a legal search is admissible. For example, if the police enter that home on fire looking for victims and find your grow-op, that evidence is admissible. -A mere refusal to consent to a search cannot be used to help establish probable cause. For example, if a police officer asks you to if he may look in your trunk, saying "no" does not, as a matter of law, give him probable cause to suspect you're hiding something. Without other grounds, he cannot search the trunk.
Yes, if there is consent by the minor, probable cause, a warrant, an arrest, or other authorization to search them
I am not sure but i will try help in the mean time. New Zealand police MUST tell you exactly what the search warrent they are issuing you means and what it gives them the right to do, if they don't it means theyre in serious trouble. You can request your lawyer attend any lawful search regardless of wether they surprise you or let you know they are comming. If you feel a search is unlawful you can get a lwayer and discuss it with them.
Yes, it can be for their own safety as well as other reasons. A person in custody, minor or adult, must be searched before they are booked. Seeing an officer does not need permission from a parent to arrest their child, a search without the parent's permission would coincide.
When police officers have a court order to search a home or a person, it is called a search warrant. If a police officer has reasonable suspicions, then they can search a person without a search warrant.
Yes they can search it
Yes, the officer may search. Police may search a building if they reasonably believe a valid search warrant has been issued. They do not have to possess the search warrant.
To come into a home the police need a search warrant to search. Without the warrant the evidence is not admissible in court. It would be an illegal search.
The police got a search warrent in order to search the suspect's house. The suspect would not allow the police to search his home without a search warrant.
When he has a warrant, when you get arrested and if you give them permission to search you
If the Police or other authorities see you commiting the crime.
Under most circumstances, no. The police usually need a warrant to search your house, car, property, etc. However, there are some cases in which the rule can be bent. If you are being arrested, the police may search you and your property for weapons or other accomplices for their own safety. If the police already have permission to be on your property, and they see some form of evidence that is clearly visible, they have the right to lawfully seize it. If the person who is in control of the property gives consent to the police, they may search it.
A warrant may be necessary for the police to search the server that Facebook is running on. It is also possible that FB may choose to allow the search without a warrant. If the 'search' is simply examining publicly available information on any web page, no. A warrant would not be necessary.
The 4th Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizure. Therefore, the police cannot just enter your home and invade your privacy without a search warrant.Likewise, the police usually cannot force a person to disrobe and submit to a body cavity search. And they cannot force a person to supply a blood sample or urine for DNA analysis.A body warrant is basically a search warrant on a person's body. The police then have the right to invade that person's privacy and search his body, take his blood, etc.
I have seen them do it All they need is 1 neighbor to say they saw ya
Ive heard of police with a search warrant finding something non-related to the search warrant, and then issuing a new search warrant on the spot regarding the new issue.