Yes, that's exactly what it is ... just a theory. It happens to be the theory that best
explains what we see, and best predicts new things that we find if we look for them.
But if you come up with a different theory tomorrow that's better at explaining what we
see, and better at predicting new things that we find when we look for them, then the
old theory will be thrown out, and yours will be accepted by astronomers and physicists
all over the world. That's how science works. The ball is in your court.
Scientific Management Theory is a theory of management concerned with the physical efficiency of an individual worker. The main objective was to improve economic efficiency and labor productivity. They wanted to be fair to the workers for a days work. To explain how the individual's motivation works strictly as a function of economic reward. :)
You could introduce some new farming methods such as the course of rotation crops.
From what little I understand of your question I am guessing that the theory that is no longer accepted could be the Geocentric Model of the Universe. That is the theory that everything revovles aroung the Earth while the Earth is stationary.
There could be a few reason that causes a female illiteracy in India. The most common one is not having enough money.
I could be wrong but I think its foo fighters and I think it could be cold day in the sun
because a scientific theory is 100% true and scientist are sure that the earth is rotating around the sun and the earth is shaped like a ball if if there is light on a part the pther will not have light
It has no scientific basis.
yes,because it could be right or wrong while when the theory became a law it will not be replace anymore.
A scientific hypothesis could be described as a reasonable guess. If it checks out, it can be promoted to the status of a scientific theory.
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
lalala
The theory that prevailed before the scientific revolution, at least in Europe, was that everything the human race needed to know could be found either in the bible or in the writings of Aristotle.
An idea that explains something could be called a theory. Good scientific theories are falsifiable which means you could prove it to be false. You can never prove a theory to be true, you can only provide evidence that supports the theory.
it is very easy to say buy u researching it Science is tentative meaning as new scientific discoveries are made modifications can be made.
"Make" could be replaced with the following:come up withconcoctconductdevelopproposepublishput forth.
A scientific law is fundamental, unquestionable and is proven beyond a doubt. Such laws occur in forces like gravitational pull.A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.A scientific theory is a type of deductive theory, in that its content (i.e. empirical data) could be expressed within some formal system of logic whose elementary rules (i.e. scientific laws) are taken as axioms. In a deductive theory, any sentence which is a logical consequence is of one or more of the axioms is also a sentence of that theory.
No. Scientific theories and laws are two very distinct groups with separate functions. A theory describes a phenomena, while a law explains it. For example, Newton's First Law EXPLAINS why objects in motion stay in motion with the idea of inertia. The theory of evolution DESCRIBES how organisms change over time.