Yes, unlike mothers, a man who has been "accused" of abuse, even in those few cases that are true, abuse the child in just 8% of the cases, as compared to 55% for mothers. Restraining orders are easy to get and costly to defend, as David Letterman learned. see link
This depends on a couple of things, the state you are in and what your court order says. If the child is living full time with one parent it is the other parent who pays child support. However, if the child is living with the father for the summer (summer possession) the father will still continue to pay the mother child support even though the child temporarily is living with the father. The reason for this is the mother still has bills that are keeping the house and such for the child to come back too. The only way a father will not have to pay is if the court order says that during summer possession the father does not have to pay child support, but normally in this case the mother would not be obligated to pay child support to the father. However in the end, people should do what is best for the children and not worry about the dollars they receive or don't receive.
No.
Yes, he still has rights, though his history of non-involvement can be brought up in custody proceedings. A mother cannot withhold visitation for non-support of a child, nor can she interfere with a visitation court order.
doesn't everyone? Her father is Elliot Degeneres
Both. He decides to protect Kikyo no matter what and he gets upset when he finds out [someone] has feelings for her, but he also gets very protective of Kagome whenever Koga comes along. If you didn't mean "protective" in that way, it's still the same answer. He would jump in front of a bullet for both of them.
His father passed away in 1988. His mother is still living and she has recently written books on parenting.
anyone can get a divorce but a direct court order from a judge on parenting classes has to do with your children. you need to revise your question to better understand what you are asking. I don't understand what parenting classes has to do with a divorce.
First, without a court order, the mother cannot prohibit the father from seeing the child. If he has not voluntarily given up his rights to the child, and a judge has not created a custody schedule, the father has as much right to see the child as the mother.Second, if the father does voluntarily give up his parenting rights, or a judge does involuntarily remove his parenting rights (or awards full custody to the mother), the father would still owe child support until his child reaches the age of majority and has graduated high school.
You can order an 18 or 19 year old but not 17, no. A 17 year old is still in high school and still needs parenting. Never kick a child out too early.
There is no past tense of protective. No matter what tense you choose it is still protective. I am being protective. I was being protective. I will be protective.
If the biological father is still alive, then he may have responsibility. If you have adopted the children or have received a 'parenting order' then you may have responsibility. Check with a lawyer or citizens advice office to clarify local law. Answer was based on sources listed as related links.
If the order contains language prohibiting you from contacting the defendant, the violation could subject you to sanctions. If not, you've still set up a good case for the defendant to show that you are not reasonably in fear of him/her, do not treat the protective order seriously, and do not need the protection.
Yes, and even if he's not the father.
He has to comply with the court order. Where he lives has no bearing on it.
Yes, unless the father objects to the temporary custody order and obtains a modification of the original order.Yes, unless the father objects to the temporary custody order and obtains a modification of the original order.Yes, unless the father objects to the temporary custody order and obtains a modification of the original order.Yes, unless the father objects to the temporary custody order and obtains a modification of the original order.
If an order is still in place, yes, even in Michigan. see links below
Not necessarily. Unless there is a restraining order in place barring the father from the children, he still has parental rights. If there is an order barring the step mother from the children, then the father still has visitation, but he cannot have them around his wife, nor can he speak about her to the children, or even so much as sign her name on a birthday card for the children.