i think it's code
code
Ancient India was governed by a priest-king who headed a strong, central government until the Aryans took over the Indus Valley. Then they had to listen to and follow the Aryans.
Babylon had a strong central government that was fair to all citizens and easily controlled. As a king, Hammurabi was a wise lawyer. He coded a list of law for the first time in history. At the outset of this history stands the figure of Hammurabi, the conqueror and lawgiver through a reign of forty-three years. Under him, the petty warring states of the lower Tigris-Euphrates valley were forced into unity and peace, and disciplined into order and security by a historic code of laws.
bill of rights
It was the first known written record indicating which punishment a could expect for violating a law
Is a view that the constitution should not be taken literally. This loose interpretation of the constitution would allow the Federal Government the rights that are not explicitly stated in the constitution. Alexander Hamilton supported this theory which allowed for a strong central government.
the answer is code
code
its code
the ancient Chinese did, if that helps at all...
the ancient Chinese did, if that helps at all...
no, it does not have a strong central government
The Federalists wanted a strong central government whereas the Republicans feared a strong central government.
A strong central government because for over 200 years, the pax romana helped solidify a strong central government by building sophistiated road systems, establishing a universal language, exercising greater dgrees of direct democracy, all with a large army. this unified the vast empire.
A strong central government
geography affected how life in Greece developed.
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. They benefitted because a strong central government was created.
the papers that urged strong central government was the articles of confederation