In anarchy, there is typically no formal system for choosing leaders, as the absence of centralized authority means that traditional structures of power do not exist. Leaders may emerge through informal consensus, charisma, or the ability to provide resources and security to their communities. In some cases, groups may form temporary coalitions based on shared interests or mutual aid, leading to the selection of individuals who can coordinate efforts. Ultimately, leadership in an anarchic context is often fluid and can change rapidly based on the needs and dynamics of the group.
In George Orwell's "1984," the original leaders of the revolution, such as Emmanuel Goldstein, are portrayed as traitors and enemies of the state by the Party. The Party uses propaganda to depict them as villains, suggesting that they were responsible for the societal issues faced by the people. Ultimately, the true motivations and fates of these leaders are obscured by the Party's oppressive regime, which seeks to maintain control through manipulation of truth and history. Their revolutionary ideals are co-opted and suppressed to ensure the Party's dominance.
how do leaders become leaders
All three were cult leaders. They used the basic pattern to gain control over their followers.
India has many thousands of villages. Each big village selects its own group of leaders. These leaders in the panchayat are known as panchayat leaders. The head of these leaders is known as a sarpanch.
democracy
Democracy
it sucks
The government of Russia is what we would call a federation and semi-presidential republic. What this means, is that Russia is union of self-governing regions united by a central, federal government. The term semi-presidential refers to a sharing of day-to-day powers and administration of the state by both the president and the prime minister. The term republic indicates that ultimately the people (the citizens of the country) have supreme control over the government because they have the ability to elect leaders and if those leaders don't do what they are elected to do they can elect different leaders.
yes.
the pigs start to run every thing
name, capitol, economy, flag, animal, tree, bird, etc, governmental leaders
Their ability to lead.
Yes, leaders can incur audience costs when they make decisions that do not align with the expectations and preferences of their followers. This can lead to a loss of support, trust, and credibility among their followers, which can ultimately impact their ability to lead effectively.
With the exception of Chile, all communist leaders have used force of arms to take control of a country.
well structured
zombie monsters have the hidden ability