He considered it to have been an error, If Catholicism was good enough for the King then it was good enough for all of France. That concluded, he revoked it. The Calvinists would convert or die.
Bake a chicken.
Two different eras. Hitler died before King was born.
Depending on your point of view, Sweden belongs to the King of Sweden, as he is the King. Or, Sweden belongs to its citizens, as they're the people that actually LIVE there.
He sees himself as king (apex)
The King can in some respects may be seen as a bad king but it depends on what view you look at. The king was trying to protect the ideals of Divine Right (the rulership of a monarchy) so his son could become king and so went against decrees like the August Decrees to save his family, however he lacked confidence in himself and barely talked to his wife Marie Antoinette. The King also made some stupid decisions like the Brunswick Manifesto which led to the emergence of Robespierre and his unavoidable execution. Perhaps not heroic, but his executioner remarked that he faced the guillotine like a man.
he was a roman catholic
Bake a chicken.
Many called him weak, inept and indecisive. Some blamed him for all of France's paroblems including the weather. The financial problems in France were not of his making. He inherited them all.
Depends on your point of view. France became a Republic until 1814, so - nobody. But for Royalists, the Dauphin (eldest son of the King) immediately became Louis XVII until he died. This is why, when the monarchy was restored in 1814, the new King (brother of Louis XVI) was called Louis XVIII.
It was a protest about the high price of bread and they demanded that the King move his residence to Paris where he would be able to personally view the plight of his people.
King of Diamonds. He has a side view.
The view then as a gift from god
A hero
Louis pasteur's view regarding the origin of life was that life comes from pre-existing life only.
He didn't liked Louis so he killed him
birth control
"The Tommyknockers" by Stephen King is written in the third person omniscient point of view. This means the narrator is not a character in the story and has access to the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters.