0
paying less for crops raised by african americans.
What else can I help you with?
What opportunities existed for sharecroppers who mad money in a growing season?
Sharecroppers who made money during a growing season had several opportunities to improve their circumstances. They could save their earnings to invest in better tools or seeds, which could enhance future crop yields. Additionally, successful sharecroppers might negotiate better terms with landowners or even save enough to eventually purchase their own land. This financial success also allowed for greater economic stability and the potential for upward mobility within their communities.
What African American woman did Lithographs of Sharecroppers and Two Generations?
why did farmers become sharecroppers sharecropping offered a measure of independance
How did the Agricultural Adjustment Administration negatively affect African Americans in the South?
The Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) negatively affected African Americans in the South by disproportionately benefiting white landowners while often sidelining Black farmers. The AAA's policies encouraged landowners to reduce crop production, leading to a decrease in labor demand, which resulted in many Black sharecroppers losing their jobs. Additionally, the government subsidies intended for landowners often did not reach Black farmers, exacerbating existing economic inequalities and reinforcing systemic discrimination within the agricultural system. This further entrenched the socio-economic struggles faced by African Americans in the rural South during that era.
Why did the sharecropper system keep sharecroppers in debt?
Because farmers as a rule only get paid when the crops are sold the depend upon credit at stores for seed and essentials. Sometimes the crop doesn't bring in enough money to pay the previous years debt so they tend to stay in debt. However if all goes well they can pay their bills and but money aside to buy the farm if that is an option or maybe buy land elsewhere and start over on their own. Sharecroppers and farmers both have hard lives that depend on the weather a great deal. So nothing is a sure thing. Many take out loans to cover costs until the crops are in and they are able to pay it back. Thats all i got :D
What was a similarity between convict and sharecroppers who were in debt?
They had no choice about continuing to work
How is sharecroppers differ from landowners?
Sharecroppers are tenants who work on land owned by someone else and pay a portion of their crops as rent. Landowners, on the other hand, own the land and may lease or rent it out to sharecroppers or other tenants. Landowners have legal ownership and control over the land, while sharecroppers work the land in exchange for a share of the crops they produce.
What happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?
They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.
What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debt to landowners?
They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.
What would happen to sharecroppers who would not pay their debts to landowners?
They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.
What would happen to sharecroppers who couldn't pay their debts to landowners?
When sharecroppers couldnÃ?t pay their debt, they were often forced to grow crops just for selling, to pay back debt. For instance, they would have to grow cotton, instead of crops that were edible.
What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?
Sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners could potentially face eviction from the land they were farming. They might also lose access to essential resources needed to sustain their livelihoods, leading to greater financial struggles and poverty.
What was possibly true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Sharecropping contracts typically favored the landowners, often resulting in unfair terms for the sharecroppers. Landowners controlled the land, tools, and supplies, ultimately keeping a significant portion of the crops produced by sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were often left with very little profit or autonomy.
What way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?
Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.
Why did the plan of scharecropping seem to be a good idea for both the landowners and the sharecroppers?
The landowners give the sharecroppers enough money to live on.
Who were sharecroppers and how did they differ from landowners?
a sharecropper is a laborer who wroks the land for the farmer who owns it, in exchange for a share of the value of the crop. the landowner was gaining more money than the sharecroppers. if you want this answer for mrs brand, here it is. good luck guys see u in school
What was probably true about contacts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Contacts between landowners and sharecroppers were likely characterized by a power imbalance, with landowners exerting significant control over the terms of the sharecropping agreements. Sharecroppers often faced exploitative conditions, including high rents and unfair debt cycles, which made it difficult for them to achieve economic independence. Communication may have been limited, with landowners typically prioritizing their profits over the welfare of the sharecroppers. Overall, these interactions were often marked by tension and inequality.
Why might the landowners want to keep the sharecroppers indebted to them?
Keeping sharecroppers indebted ensures a cheap and reliable labor force, as indebted sharecroppers are less likely to leave or demand better working conditions. It also gives landowners control over the sharecroppers' output, allowing them to maintain economic and social power over them.
