If you mean "Could we see the changes in the moon's apparent shape ?", that's doubtful.
Consider Venus:
-- When Venus is closest to the earth, its distance is only about 1/4th the distance from us to the sun.
-- Venus' diameter is about 3 and 1/2 times the diameter of the moon.
-- Venus goes through a full set of phases as seen from earth, but even with its comparatively large size
and at that comparatively short distance, we can't see them without a telescope.
Paris. The moon is about 220,000 miles away from Earth. Earth's circumference is about 25,000 miles. Paris is much closer to New York (3,636 miles) then the moon (238,857 miles). No distance between two places on Earth is greater than the distance to the moon. The circumference of the Earth is only 24,901 miles so that's pretty much the furthest you can go between two points on Earth. The distance to the moon as mentioned is over 238,857 miles.
False. The attractive force of gravity decreases with the square of the distance.
Africa is greater in distance from north to south. This distance is approximately 5,000 miles. From east to west, Africa is approximately 4,600 miles.
No - the Earth's shadow (at the distance of the Moon) is much larger than the diameter of the Moon.No - the Earth's shadow (at the distance of the Moon) is much larger than the diameter of the Moon.No - the Earth's shadow (at the distance of the Moon) is much larger than the diameter of the Moon.No - the Earth's shadow (at the distance of the Moon) is much larger than the diameter of the Moon.
That would be the Earth's distance from the Sun (at aphelion) plus the Earth-Moon distance. The latter is insignificant.
The distance from the Earth to the Moon is greater than the distance from the Earth to the International Space Station.
It depends on its intrinsic brilliance and its distance from the observer
First Quarter occurs when the moon is at right angles with respect to the Earth and sun. During this phase, the moon has completed one quarter of it's orbit around the Earth and an observer on Earth will see half of the moon illuminated.
There are eight main moon phases that can be seen by an observer on Earth: new moon, waxing crescent, first quarter, waxing gibbous, full moon, waning gibbous, third quarter, and waning crescent.
About a quarter of a million miles.
That person in London would see a new moon.
It's about a quarter million miles greater or less than the distance of the earth to the sun. That's because at times the moon is "between" the earth and the sun and is closer to the sun, and at other times the moon is on the "far side" of the earth from the sun. The distance to the sun from earth varies from about 147 million to 152 million kilometers. The moon is from about 363,000 to 405,000 kilometers from the earth. The distance from the earth to the moon isn't much when compared to the distance to our local star.
Azimuth is the distance of a celestial object from the observer who is generally somewhere on the Earth's surface
No, a star's absolute magnitude is a measure of its intrinsic brightness regardless of its distance from the observer. It is a standardized measure that allows for comparison of the brightness of stars at a set distance.
Everybody on Earth who can see the moon at any particular moment sees the same phase. The distance across the Earth, is not far, compared to the distance to the moon, for there to be any perceivable change in perspective.
The earth's axis of rotation is tilted relative to its orbit around the sun, causing Polaris to align with the earth's axis. When an observer measures the altitude of Polaris above the horizon, they can determine their latitude because Polaris' altitude corresponds to the observer's angular distance from the North Pole.
I'm thinking center to equator