Milo O'Shea
The motto of Verdict Research is 'Think Retail Think Verdict'.
Judge Mathis awarded the plaintiff 5000 bucks but didn't order the defendant to return his own leg back to the plaintiff. One of the most hilarious episodes ever. LOL I am the defendant in that case and yes, it was quite bizarre. It took Judge Mathis several attempts to reach a verdict as there was no precedence. Many law schools were blogging as to whether it was an actual body part and whether or not the auction was legal. The real estate warehouse knew of the leg and continued the sale.
medical malpractice judicial misconduct witness tampering attorney client privilege abuse perjury
In the movie "The Verdict," the expert witness plays a crucial role in supporting the plaintiff's case against the defendants. Their testimony provides essential credibility and scientific backing, helping to establish the negligence of the medical professionals involved. The expert's insights are pivotal in illustrating the gravity of the harm caused and the impact on the victim's life, ultimately aiding the jury in understanding the complexities of the case.
serve in court and listen to what the defendant and the verdict has to say
I am going to assume this has to deal with criminal law as it is in the "Crime and Criminal Law", so this information does not apply to civil (Though it is similar). The good news is that if a jury returns a verdict of not guilty, that is it - the defendant is not guilty on those charges. It can never be overturned (Assuming there is not some type of jury problem and there is a retrial). Basically, an appeals court can never overturn a not guilty verdict when it is returned by a jury. This is based on the doctrine of claim preclusion. If someone could be tried twice on the same charges, this would be a deprivation of the 14th amendment due process right afforded to the defendant by the state. There are some instances to take note of, however. One being when the jury returns a guilty verdict, and the judge grants a motion notwithstanding the verdict (Essentially overturning the jury's verdict and finding the defendant not guilty). This CAN be appealed and overturned. This is not subject to claim preclusion. Good luck.
No, a judge cannot overturn a not guilty verdict. Once a jury or judge has found a defendant not guilty, the verdict is final and cannot be changed by the judge.
The Defendant in a cross claim by Vineetha Susan Thomas
The verdict is 'Guilty.' The finder of fact (usually a jury) has to feel that the evidence proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
convicted, or conviction - a conviction is the verdict that results when a court of law finds a defendant guilty of a crime.
"Judgment for Defendant" means that the defendant wins the case. In a criminal case, a judgment for defendant would be a "not guilty" verdict (usually). In a civil case, it would usually mean that the defendant does not have to pay money to the person who sued him or her (known as the "plaintiff").
Yes, in a courtroom setting, it is customary for the judge to ask the defendant to rise before the verdict is read. This practice emphasizes the seriousness of the moment and ensures that the defendant is present and attentive to the outcome of the trial. It is a formal part of the judicial process, reflecting the gravity of the legal proceedings.
Verdict is the decision as to guilty or not guilty.
Will the Defendant rise and face the jury!
A defendant can seek relief from a guilty verdict by filing an appeal, presenting new evidence of innocence, or filing a motion for post-conviction relief alleging constitutional violations or ineffective assistance of counsel.
Miss Rachel is devastated by the guilty verdict, feeling that justice has not been served. She is disillusioned by the legal system and feels deeply for the defendant.