If the quotes were direct quotes of the writer, relevant to your writing topic, and not hearsay; then yes. If the information is second hand or "passed on" in the letter then no. (there could be relevance if you were writing about the letters but that would be limited)
a primary source.
By definition of a historical primary source (by someone with direct knowledge from the time), a original political cartoon is a primary source. By definition of an English primary source (it is printed), it is a primary source. By definition of the final form of primary sources (see definition of primary source on www.answer.com), it is based on someone's interpretation of the time and is thus a secondary source.
No, bibliographic refers to books.
A journal written by a black south African describing his experiences with apartheid polices -Apex
primary
our mom told me
diary farmer primary or secondary
D. A letter written from an eyewitness to events
A primary source might be a letter, photograph, or speech that
Yes, a letter written to a soldier's wife would be considered a primary source as it directly reflects the experiences and perspectives of the person writing it.
A letter is a primary source.
A primary source is a source material that is closely related to the subject discribed with in.
The use of an artifact as a primary source is different than the use of a written primary source because when you exacavate for an artifact, you may have to make guesses. However, with a written primary source, you don't need to guess as the writing inside will have the answers to your questions or guesses.
secondary
yes
Primary Source - Apex Learning
It depends on what you need it for :)