Should democracy replaced by dictatorship in India?

Answer 1

look at china how fast it is moving ahead and compare that to India so many glitches like failure to terrorism corruption poverty foreign policy . INDIA badly needs a strong leadership the politics has done more damage to India's integrity than anything else it must be finished and replaced with the same one-party system in china .i am not supporting power in the hands of single person but a group of most prolific selfless persons who have the will and vigour to take this country to a position of a global leader

here is where the problem arises,India has some selfless and dedicated leaders but not all.even giving the power to group of people will not solve the problem. India has the second largest population in the world,how can you expect some bunch of people sitting in their air conditioned rooms will ever be able to understand the problems of the poor?

in a democratic country all people above 18 can vote but only about 60% of the population are educated and aware about the political systems so this does create an issue in elections but as more awareness is being spread we will surely overcome that barrier.plus in dictatorship u have no right of freemdom of expression.basically, India is growing and gradually it will reach the top.

On Contrary, India is one of the greatest democracies in the world and the word 'dictator' is losing its ground day by day. The elections in Pakistan have brought a set back for Musharraf, the dictator president. Another era of dictatorship of Fidel Castro comes to an end after his stepping down. Dictator Saddam Hussein is no longer to rule. So, what's the message we get here?

The growth and stability of a nation is closely related to its foreign policy, and management of internal problems like poverty, employment, economic development. The global economy is flexible today because of best foreign policies of countries across the world. In a pragmatic view, India is good at maintaining its foreign policy with the US, China and Russia. This foreign policy would no longer remain best if the nation is headed by a dictator.

Dictatorship in India might cause unrest and conflict and that will lead to destruction, as evident from world history. The dictators like - Vladimir Lenin, Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler and others caused destruction and unrest.

From Indian perspective, the dictatorship could be a curse for its developing path. However, the national epidemics like - political corruption, underdevelopment, poverty, clash over domicile etc will stay remain even in a dictator's regime.

India is a vast country and known for unity in diversity, and one dictator would not be able address the problems that arise in different parts of the country. The bottom line is that dictatorship is not always a negative aspect for the nations but, it can't be termed as a positive step in the era of globalization.