0
What else can I help you with?
Is anarchy possible?
yes,but to many people live off of the government.you have to break that bond
When did The Anarchy happen?
Anarchy has been around for generations and none knows exactly when anarchy was started, but it has been around for a while. But the only real society we can say had a true anarchy was Catalonia Spain
How do you spell anarchy?
The correct spelling is 'anarchy'.
Who governs anarchy?
Anarchy is, by definition, governed by nobody.
Does an anarchy have a Constitution?
NO. The entire point of an anarchy is to operate without any government or any governmental principles. If an anarchy has a constitution, this would indicate how a government would be established, in direct contradiction to anarchy.
Who is eligible to submit articles to Sailing Anarchy?
Anyone is allowed to submit an article to Sailing Anarchy. To submit an article you have to go to their submission page, fill out the form provided and upload the article.
What is 'anarchy' when translated from English to Italian?
Anarchia is an Italian equivalent of the English word "anarchy." The feminine singular noun may be preceded immediately by the feminine singular l' since Italian employs definite articles where English does and does not use "the." The pronunciation will be "(L)A-nar-KEE-a" in Pisan Italian.
Why did the Articles of Confederation give most powers to the states?
The Articles of Confederation created the foundation for the first US government after the Revolutionary War, and many of the decisions for its organization were rooted in the fear of supplanting England's monarchy with one of our own. The Founding Fathers knew some form of central government would be beneficial to all of them, but the states wanted to retain sovereignty over their individual territories.There were two groups debating how to balance power between a central government and the states. The Conservatives wanted a strong central government because they feared anarchy among the states; the Radicals wanted the states to have primary control because they feared replacing one strong central government with another would defeat the purpose of the Revolution.The Radicals held their ground and insisted the balance of power rest with the states. Once the War with Great Britain ended, they saw no reason for the Continental Congress to have any form of supremacy, and believed ceding authority would be detrimental to their democratic ideals.Article II of the Articles of Confederation reflects the Radicals' thinking. The Articles of Confederation stripped the Second Continental Congress of most power, including the ability to tax or raise armies.Article II"Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled."After a decade living under a confederacy, it became clear the Articles of Confederation created as many problems as they solved. This lead the Second Continental Congress to authorize state delegates to resolve these problems by amending the Articles, at the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. The result of this attempt was the US Constitution, which laid the foundation for the second organized US government.
Why was liberty so important to the American founding fathers?
There have been hundreds of books written regarding this question, with hundreds of answers better than I am capable of explaining. To me, the simple answer is because they had NO LIBERTY for so long that it had become the primary goal.
What were the reasons Americans wanted a new constitution after the article of confederation?
The main reason was that the articles of confederation allowed for too weak a government to provide for common defense, this original constitution drifted to far towards Anarchy. If you do not understand the American political system the way it was let me explain. on the extreme left side is Tyranny which has great control over the people and is unfair, monarchies, oligarchies and to a lesser extent democracies fall under the category of Tyrannical government systems. On the extreme right side of the of the political bar is Anarchy which has no law and the people have no protection or laws save themselves. In the center of the bar is a republic which has the correct balance of government and freedom and is controlled by the people. With the articles of confederation being too far to the right side the government would destabilize and probably be turned into an oligarchy or other tyrannical government. So the founders developed a new constitution that was a Republic and in the center of the political spectrum and could remain strong without infringing peoples natural rights.
What group believed that failure to approve the Constitution would lead to chaos and mob rule?
The Federalists believed that failure to approve the Constitution would lead to chaos and mob rule. They argued that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order and prevent the instability that had characterized the period under the Articles of Confederation. Prominent Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, emphasized that without a unified framework, the country could descend into anarchy. Their concerns about disorder were a key motivation for advocating for the ratification of the Constitution.
Where can i find the actual text for Robert Nozick's the experience machine?
The text you are looking for can be found in Robert Nozick's book "Anarchy, State, and Utopia," specifically in Chapter 3. The book is widely available in bookstores, libraries, and online retailers. Alternatively, you may also find the text in academic databases or by searching for scholarly articles that discuss Nozick's work.
How did Leaders like George Washington react to shay's Rebellion?
Leaders like George Washington viewed Shays' Rebellion as a significant threat to the nascent republic and its stability. Washington expressed concern over the uprising, fearing it could undermine the authority of the federal government and lead to anarchy. The rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, prompting calls for a stronger central government, which ultimately contributed to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution. Washington's reaction underscored the need for a balance between liberty and order in the new nation.
What are some possible problems that might result for the lack of a national court system?
anarchy
How did the legacy of Shays's Rebellion influence attitudes toward the Constitution?
Shays's Rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, particularly the inability of the federal government to maintain order and address economic grievances. This uprising fueled fears of anarchy and instability, prompting many leaders to advocate for a stronger central government. As a result, the rebellion significantly influenced the Constitutional Convention, leading to the creation of a more robust federal system designed to prevent such unrest and ensure effective governance. Ultimately, it contributed to a greater urgency for ratifying the Constitution among the states.
Why did the founding fathers or framers write the constitution?
Before our founding fathers declared indipendence, acts, such-as the stamp act, the tea act, the intolorable acts ect., made the some of the colonist very upset, including the founding fathers. These acts are what caused the Revolutionary War. When the Revolutionary War was over, (which the U.S. obviously won) the colonies (now states actualy) became disorganized, nearly on the verge of anarchy. The Continintal Congress decided that a document was needed to unite the states more solidly. So they started writing the Constitution. When they wrote the Constitution, they did not want to be like England and make the same mistakes. So they looked at all the acts that started this whole thing and based a large portion on rights on not allowing anthing remotely resem-bling the acts. So in nutshell, the Constitution was written the way it was because the United States did not want to be like England. There is more to it, but that would take an entire text-book to fit al the information in.
What is the absence of a system of government and law called?
A society without government or laws would be considered an anarchy, unless that nation is going through a revolution.
