They are related to each other. Hun means one. Hun means that Turks + Mongols. Leader of the Huns are Turks.
But ın early ages Mongol population was very low. Turks and the Mongols living together with each other.
All of the Huns related to Turks Mongols and Hungarians. The first known khante of the Turks was Asian Hun Empire Mete Khan was the best known leader of this country and every Turks and the Mongol know this name.
Every Hungarian and Turk knows Attila.
Buddhists
vikings mongols brought peace to the world also brought different trypes of people together...
ATTILA --- meaning the father of the huns. attil atil attel atli atill attil - AA . etzel...... Ata -- father ila -- ?don't know. The name Toorila has the same root with the name Attila. Tooril was the leader of the Kerait MONGOLS and maybe a descendent of the huns. sory my bad English.
White Huns
The Huns only invaded Persia.
they both fight wars thats y they are the same :| Get a life and do your homework :-|
Buddhists
vikings mongols brought peace to the world also brought different trypes of people together...
Yes, the Huns and Mongols are not directly related. The Huns were a nomadic group from Central Asia who lived around 370-469 AD, while the Mongols were a separate nomadic group from the same region who emerged later, around the 13th century. Though they both originated from Central Asia, they were distinct groups with different histories and cultures.
Yes, the Huns and the Mongols were both nomadic warrior groups from Central Asia, but they were not directly related to each other. The Huns were active in Europe during the late Roman Empire, while the Mongols emerged in the 13th century and established a vast empire in Asia.
Buddhists
In 220BC, the present Mongolia was controlled by the Huns.
Yes. The Huns were an offshoot of the Mongols. They were not Germanic.
People from the area that later spawned the Mongol empire, the great grass steppes, were known as the Huns at around that time.
The Attacks of the Huns under Attila and later Mongols.
The military tactics and strategies of the Mongols differed from those of the Huns in ancient warfare in several key ways. The Mongols were known for their highly organized and disciplined army, skilled in horseback warfare and using advanced tactics such as feigned retreats and coordinated attacks. In contrast, the Huns relied more on their sheer numbers and speed, utilizing hit-and-run tactics and overwhelming their enemies with sheer force. Additionally, the Mongols were adept at siege warfare and had a more sophisticated command structure, while the Huns were more decentralized and relied on individual leaders for direction.
the huns, nomads, mongols