they both fight wars thats y they are the same :| Get a life and do your homework :-|
The mongol pony was the Amtrac engine of its day, and the roadway was its set of track. Patton would have been comfortable with the Huns.
The huns :)
They discriminated because punishments for crimes were unequal.
Germans wer often called "Huns" by their enemies in World War I
huns.
Buddhists
Yes, the Huns and Mongols are not directly related. The Huns were a nomadic group from Central Asia who lived around 370-469 AD, while the Mongols were a separate nomadic group from the same region who emerged later, around the 13th century. Though they both originated from Central Asia, they were distinct groups with different histories and cultures.
Yes, the Huns and the Mongols were both nomadic warrior groups from Central Asia, but they were not directly related to each other. The Huns were active in Europe during the late Roman Empire, while the Mongols emerged in the 13th century and established a vast empire in Asia.
Buddhists
They are related to each other. Hun means one. Hun means that Turks + Mongols. Leader of the Huns are Turks. But ın early ages Mongol population was very low. Turks and the Mongols living together with each other. All of the Huns related to Turks Mongols and Hungarians. The first known khante of the Turks was Asian Hun Empire Mete Khan was the best known leader of this country and every Turks and the Mongol know this name. Every Hungarian and Turk knows Attila.
In 220BC, the present Mongolia was controlled by the Huns.
Yes. The Huns were an offshoot of the Mongols. They were not Germanic.
The Attacks of the Huns under Attila and later Mongols.
vikings mongols brought peace to the world also brought different trypes of people together...
the huns, nomads, mongols
The northern barbarian invaders: The Mongols, the Manchus, the Huns, etc...
The military tactics and strategies of the Mongols differed from those of the Huns in ancient warfare in several key ways. The Mongols were known for their highly organized and disciplined army, skilled in horseback warfare and using advanced tactics such as feigned retreats and coordinated attacks. In contrast, the Huns relied more on their sheer numbers and speed, utilizing hit-and-run tactics and overwhelming their enemies with sheer force. Additionally, the Mongols were adept at siege warfare and had a more sophisticated command structure, while the Huns were more decentralized and relied on individual leaders for direction.