because it may have violence because for the movie that you are talking about they are like, remix's of the real story. so i would say violence or inappropriate scenes.
Violence, by its nature, often leads to harm and suffering, perpetuating cycles of pain and revenge rather than resolving conflicts. While some may argue that violence can be justified in certain circumstances, such as self-defense or protecting the oppressed, these situations can quickly spiral out of control. Ultimately, advocating for non-violent solutions fosters understanding, dialogue, and long-term peace, emphasizing that true justice and resolution come from addressing the root causes of conflict rather than resorting to aggression.
Most people that watch Nickelodeon (that I know of) are of the younger generation. Because of this, parents are reluctant to introduce them to war & violence as well as small romance. The Avatar: The Last Airbender series is more 'broadly' approached on the internet, so parents may also be reluctant for their children to search it on Google.
No, an individual is not justified in doing wrong simply because others do it. Morality and ethics are based on principles that transcend popular behavior; just because a majority may engage in wrongdoing does not make it right. Each person is responsible for their own actions and must evaluate their choices based on ethical standards rather than societal trends. Ultimately, accountability lies with the individual, regardless of the actions of the crowd.
You may want to check if you inserted it right because it never did that to me.
It may be, because so far, there's been more action and violence.
De Beauvoir argues that in some situations, violence may be inevitable as a response to oppressive structures that perpetuate inequality. She suggests that violence can be morally justified when used as a means to resist and challenge systems of oppression that deny individuals their freedom and agency. However, she does not condone violence that is used for purely destructive or oppressive purposes.
In order to change an unjust government, you need numerous numbers of people on your side. If peaceful negotiations fail, violence may be justified, ie: American & French Revolution. Options are, peaceful demonstrations, boycotts, sit-ins, strikes, civil action, letters expressing your views to politicians in your area, lobby in Congress, vote
Eddie's actions at the end of the story can be seen as justified because he was seeking closure and redemption for past mistakes. However, some may argue that his actions were extreme or unnecessary. Ultimately, it depends on the individual's perspective and interpretation of Eddie's character development throughout the story.
because it may have violence because for the movie that you are talking about they are like, remix's of the real story. so i would say violence or inappropriate scenes.
violence in movies is not could because it encorages us to fight(although it may be fun) it also causes pain.
"Maximum Ride" may be rated PG-13 due to its action and violence scenes, as well as themes that may be intense or frightening for younger audiences. The story often involves high-stakes situations and risks that are more suitable for older viewers.
No, oppression is NEVER justified. This begs the question of who makes them superior. What may seem superior for you may not be for someone else.
yes they deserve it after what odysseus has gone through
Because in most states, stalking is considered domestic violence, and domestic violence is against the law. Stalking may be either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the acts committed.
The affects that violence have on schools are that the children may bring the violence home or if they are being bullied they may start to slack off in the classes.
People who are prone to violence have unresolved rage and anger issues, coupled with poor impulse control. They are not compelled to be violent, but rather become so because of inability (or lack of desire) to maintain control. Violence is not an addiction. Violent people may have emotional or mental disorders that make it difficult for them to avoid violence, but they are not addicted to violence. (They may, of course, be addicted to all sorts of other things, and often are.)